Controlling helium balloon attitude

  • Thread starter Thread starter bbd001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon Helium
AI Thread Summary
Controlling the attitude of helium balloons can be achieved by using a tank, pump, and valve system, allowing for adjustments without cutting the balloons or dropping weight. Releasing helium from the tank effectively reduces buoyancy, similar to cutting balloons, while pumping air in or out can slightly adjust overall system weight. However, this method may not provide sufficient control for precise attitude adjustments. A bladder within the main balloon can also facilitate air movement, helping to manage pressure changes at higher altitudes. Overall, while some control is possible, limitations exist in achieving fine-tuned adjustments.
bbd001
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is it possible to control the attitude of helium balloons without cutting the balloons or dropping the weight? (e.g. using a remote control to control "something" to adjust the attitude)

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thx for the reply russ.

Can you give me more information?

If I have a tank fill with helium, it is part of the system. Releasing the gas from the tank is like cutting some of the balloons. If I want to move up again, the system cannot get extra helium back from the sky.

If I pump/release air (instead of helium or other material that is lighter than air), it can adjust the over all system weight a little bit, but it should not enough to adjust the attitude. Is that right?

thx
 
bbd001 said:
Can you give me more information? If I have a tank fill with helium, it is part of the system. Releasing the gas from the tank is like cutting some of the balloons.
I'm pretty sure he meant to use the tank to move the higher density helium from the tank into the balloon, and a pump to move the lower density helium in the balloon back into the tank. The balloon would expand or contract depending on how much helium was in the balloon, and the tanks expansion or contraction would not be significant.

You'd have a side issue with the balloon expanding due to lower pressure of the atmoshpere at higher altitudes.
 
You have a bladder in the main balloon that you can pump air in or out off.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top