Convergence of a Recursive Sequence

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a recursively defined sequence {an} with a1=1 and an+1=\frac{1}{2+a subn}. Participants are tasked with demonstrating the convergence of this sequence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the boundedness of the sequence and its behavior, noting attempts to use induction to show it is decreasing, which some suggest may not be valid. Questions about the applicability of the contraction mapping theorem and the limit definition are also raised.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the nature of the sequence and suggesting alternative approaches to demonstrate convergence. There is recognition of potential mistakes in reasoning and exploration of different mathematical concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the sequence's behavior and the effectiveness of induction, indicating a need for further clarification on the properties of the sequence.

life is maths
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sequence {an} defined recursively by a1=1 and an+1=\frac{1}{2+a subn}, n\geq1. Show that the sequence is convergent.

Homework Equations


If a sequence is bdd below and decreasing or it is bdd above and increasing, then it is convergent.

The Attempt at a Solution


{an}\geq0, hence it is bounded below. I checked a few terms from the beginning and obtained a decreasing sequence. I tried induction to show this, but it didn't work. Base case is O.K. a0>a1 Suppose ak>ak+1.
Then we get
ak+2=\frac{1}{2+a sub(k+1)}>\frac{1}{2+a subk}=ak+1, and ak+2>ak+1. I feel like I'm doing a stupid mistake, and I can't understand, if this is true, why the induction does not work. I would be grateful if you could help me. Thanks for your time and effort :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Induction doesn't always work since the sequence is not descreasing. If you check more terms then you see that.

Are you familiar with the contraction mapping theorem by Banach?
 
micromass said:
Induction doesn't always work since the sequence is not descreasing. If you check more terms then you see that.

Are you familiar with the contraction mapping theorem by Banach?

Ah, really? So that was my mistake... I have no idea about contraction mapping theorem.
Thanks for enlightening me :biggrin:
Is there a more practical way to show a sequence is convergent? :confused:
 
Can I use the limit definition? I see no way out... :(
 
You may be able to show that the "odd" elements of the sequence form a decreasing subsequence and the "even" elements an increasing subsequence ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K