Convergence of a sequence, {(-1)^n}n>=1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the sequence {(-1)^n} for n>=1. Participants are tasked with proving that this sequence does not converge.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the idea of defining subsequences and their limits, questioning whether these subsequences can be considered convergent. There is also a suggestion to use the Cauchy definition of convergence and to consider the implications of assuming convergence leading to a contradiction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants examining different aspects of convergence and the validity of their arguments. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of subsequences and their limits, while others are contemplating the use of formal definitions to strengthen their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the terminology used for subsequences and their convergence. Participants are also navigating the requirements of the homework prompt while trying to formulate their proofs.

missavvy
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that {(-1)n} n>=1 does not converge

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If i define two subsequences, say {(-1)2n} = A and {(-1)2n+1} =B of that original sequence, then
A converges to 1 and B converges to -1 ?

Is this correct at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
missavvy said:

Homework Statement



Prove that {(-1)n} n>=1 does not converge

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If i define two subsequences, say {(-1)2n} = A and {(-1)2n+1} =B of that original sequence, then
A converges to 1 and B converges to -1 ?

Is this correct at all?
The sequence {(-1)2n} converges to 1, and the other sequence converges to -1, but A and B aren't sequences (they're numbers), so you shouldn't talk about them converging.

What about assuming that {(-1)n}, for n>=1, converges, and arriving at a contradiction?
 
Hm okay, so should I use the cauchy definition of convergence? (If yes, how would I put the "limit" in?)
 
In your OP you showed that you have two subsequences that converge to different limits. This indeed shows that our series cannot be convergent. To me, it's a valid proof...

Am I making a mistake here??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K