Convert Continuous Inverse Scale Parameter to Physically Relevant Units

Salish99
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
How to convert a continuous inverse scale parameter into a physically relevant quantity:
1) What is a CISP, and why is called continuous and why inverse?

2) how do I deal with it:
Example:
On
http://www.apec.umn.edu/faculty/gpederso/documents/4501/risk45DistFunc.pdf
the error function is defined as
f(x)= h/sqrt(Pi()) x e^(-(hx)2)

Now, in P.G. shewmon. Diffusion in solids. McGrawHill NY, 1963, the function for the diffusion of a solid thin film into a bulk material is given as
c(x,t) = alpha/sqrt(4Pi()Dt) x exp (-x2/4Dt)

if I sub in one equation into the other, then for the first term the continuous inverse scale parameter
h = alpha/sqrt(4Dt)
but for the term in the exponential part of the equation
h = 1/sqrt(4Dt)

So, I MUST set alpha = 1 and that's not physically right for diffusion experiments.

Alpha is the concentration of the solute (i.e. the stuff in the thin film that we want to investigate the diffusion of), in terms of counts or intensity. That changes over distance.
It does not occur within the exponential term.

How do I convert h into physically meaningful data? Do I assume the concentration alpha remains outside the first term equation?

Let's say, concentration alpha is 6000 If I fit my data to the erf, I get my output fitting parameter h as 0.71. What is D now
is it option a:
D = alpha2/(h24t),
or option b
D = 1/(h24t), in which I don't take the initial surface concentration into account.

Thanks for your thoughts / help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Update: I devised the following method:
I traced the maximum in my data, and divided the entire data by that maximum, thus normalizing it to 1. Thus, as a result now all my concentration is normalized to 1, and I can assume alpha = 1.
Once I calculate the D out of the equation D = 1/(h24t), in the case of 500 h and an h of 0.16283 this comes to D = 0.007406 1/h. I assume the unit of the inverse scale parameter is micrometer.
Then it would be:
D=0.007 um/h

Can I do that? - How can I find the units of my inverse scale parameter?
Or do I still have to multiply D by the former maximum concentration values?
What is a continuous inverse scale parameter, and why is called continuous and why is it inverse (and inverse to what?)?
These links doe not cover my questions:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=269208
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=275747
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=232883
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=253505
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=178318
 


anyone who can kindly help me? :shy:
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top