Converting cartesian unit vectors to spherical unit vectors

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around converting Cartesian unit vectors to their spherical counterparts for applying Gauss's theorem to fluid flow. The user initially seeks clarification on the spherical equivalents of the Cartesian basis vectors, ultimately identifying them as \hat{r}, \hat{\theta}, and \hat{\phi}. They express difficulty in computing the scalar product of the vector field with the area element after conversion, resulting in a complex expression. Suggestions are made regarding the setup of the integral and the potential simplifications by aligning the spherical coordinate system with the Cartesian axes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly transforming both the vector components and the unit vectors for successful integration.
kde2520
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Well, it's all in the title. I just need to show that Gauss's theorem applies to this fluid flow and have converted all my (x,y,z) components to their respective (r,theta,phi) versions, but I can't remember the spherical counterparts of \hat{x},\hat{y},\hat{z}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wouldn't it have been easier to look at the page you linked to and see that there is no direct conversion there than to assume that I didn't already do that and reply to my post?... maybe not. Thanks though.
 
I thought you wanted \hat{r}, \hat{\theta}, \hat{\phi}. I would call those the "spherical counterparts" of the cartesian basis vectors. What do you want?
 
You're right, I didn't word it very well. Here's what I was trying to compute:

\vec{u} \cdot d\vec{A}

where

\vec{u} = (2xy^{2}+2xz^{2})\hat{x} + (x^{2}y)\hat{y} + (x^{2}z)\hat{z}

and

d\vec{A} = r^{2}sin\theta d\theta d\phi \hat{r}.

I first converted the magnitudes of \vec{u} to spherical coordinates, and what I intended to do was convert \hat{x}, \hat{y}, \hat{z} to spherical as well. Does that make sense?

Anyway, I ended up using \hat{r} = sin\theta cos\phi \hat{x} + sin\theta sin\phi \hat{y} + cos\theta \hat{z}, leaving the unit vecors in the cartesian basis.

But then when I tried to compute the scalar product I ended up with a virtually unintegratable expression. The left side of the equation (remember I was trying to show that Gauss' theorem holds over a spherical region a^{2} = x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2}) came out to \frac{8}{3} \pi a^{5}.

Do you think I was setting it up right? I was thinking that I probably skrewed up some algebra while computing the dot product.
 
If you are integrating over a sphere of radius a, then the normal vector is (x*xhat+y*yhat+z*zhat)/a. Does that suggest any simplifications? Sorry, it's kind of late here so I haven't really thought this through.
 
Another tip. Once you have your x,y,z expression for the integrand. You can choose the axis of the spherical coordinate system to point along any cartesian axis.
 
Last edited:
When I converted Laplacian from cartesian to spherical I use these unit vectors. I think my weblog will be usefull for you.
http://buyanik.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/laplacian-in-spherical-coordinates/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K