Finding Polar Unit Vectors from Cartesian Vector - Pete

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around transforming a Cartesian vector into polar unit vectors and expressing the original vector as a linear combination of these polar unit vectors. The original poster presents a specific Cartesian vector, \(\vec{v} = 3\hat{x} + 4\hat{y}\), and seeks clarification on the transformation process, noting conflicting information from various resources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of polar unit vectors and their relationship to Cartesian coordinates. There are questions about the transformation process and how to express the given vectors in terms of the polar unit vectors. Some participants express confusion regarding the setup of the problem and the vectors involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested looking into coordinate rotation as a potential method for understanding the transformation. There is no explicit consensus yet on how to proceed with the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster missed a lecture, which may contribute to their confusion. There are references to different vectors and the need to express them relative to new axes defined by the polar unit vectors.

petertheta
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I have a worksheet that due to missing the lecture I'm now stuck on.

You are given a cartesian vector and told find the polar unit vecors and hence express the original vector as a linear combination of the polar unit vectors just found. I've searched resources online but feel that there is conflicting information. It would be good if you could help clarify the methodology to do this transformation. I generally understand the nature of the unit vector.

So here's the question:

\vec{v} = 3\hat{x} + 4\hat{y}

Where the x-hat etc are the cartesian unit vectors.

But what I have found through reading through online notes etc gives the polar unit vectors as:
\hat{r} = \cos{\theta}\hat{x}+\sin{\theta}\hat{y}
\hat{\theta} = -\sin{\theta}\hat{x} + \cos{\theta}\hat{y}


The thing is though these are still containing the cartesian unit vectors so I can't really see how a transformation has taken place.

Can you help?

Thanks - Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Pete! :smile:
petertheta said:
You are given a cartesian vector and told find the polar unit vecors and hence express the original vector as a linear combination of the polar unit vectors just found.

i'm not sure i understand the question :confused:

if the origin is at O = (0,0), and if P = (3,4),

then the vector OP is (3,4), and the unit polar vectors are (3/5,4/5) and (-4/5,3/5)

so OP = 5(3/5,4/5) + 0(-4/5,3/5)

but usually you are given a vector PQ, and asked to express that as a combination of (3/5,4/5) and (-4/5,3/5) :confused:
 
There is another vector given but I assume this to be just another vector for which I must do the same transformation to and expressing as a linear combination of \hat{r} and \hat{\theta} it's \vec{u} = 5\hat{x} + 0\hat{y} so not the point PQ like you suggest.

P
 
my guess is that the 5x + 0y vector is to start at P :smile:
 
I've not seen this method before can you explicitly show me how to proceed?

In the question the vectors are the other way around so \vec{v1} = 5\hat{x} + 0\hat{y} and \vec{v2} = 3\hat{x} + 4\hat{y}

Thanks
 
good morning! :smile:

you transfer the origin from O to P,

then your second vector is expressed relative to the usual x,y axes,

and you need to express it relative to the two new axes along r and θ :wink:
 
I'm afraid I've not covered this before so am at a loss of even how to start this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K