Converting parametric to cartesian equation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around converting a parametric equation of a plane into its Cartesian form. The initial parametric equations are derived, leading to expressions for x, y, and z in terms of parameters s and t. The participants explore eliminating s and t to derive a Cartesian equation, ultimately arriving at x - y + z = 2. They also discuss finding the normal vector using the cross product of direction vectors, which leads to a different Cartesian equation, -x - y - z = -6, highlighting that both equations represent the same plane but in different forms. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between different representations of the same geometric entity.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
1. I found the parametric equation of a plane;

\left(\begin{array}{ccc}x\\y\\z\end{ar ray}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\3\end{ar ray}\right) +s\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\1\\0\end{ar ray}\right) +t \left(\begin{array}{ccc}2\\1\\-1\end{ar ray}\right)

s,t ∈ R.

I was asked to find a Cartesian equation. So I write down the three equations;

x=1+s+2t
y=2+s+t
z=3−t

I don't understand how this set can be solved. What's the aim? Do I need to eliminate s,t from the equations?


3. The Attempt at a Solution

1) x=1+s+2t
2) y=2+s+t
3) z=3−t

If I subtract (1) and (2) => x–y=t–1
Subtracting the third from the second => y-z = s-1+2t
And I can also find an expression for t, from the (3) => t=3-z

Could you please show me how we can use this info to find the cartesian equation of the plane.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have t=3-z. This is an excellent start, as you can go back to say x-y=t-1 and exchange t with 3-z. Then you have an equation in x,y and z
 
So as soon as we have an equation in x,y and z it will be the cartesian equation?
So, therefore x–y+z=2 is the cartesian equation of this plane.
 
roam said:
So as soon as we have an equation in x,y and z it will be the cartesian equation?
So, therefore x–y+z=2 is the cartesian equation of this plane.

That will work. A plane can also be defined by a point in the plane and a vector that is normal to the plane. In your case, the point (1, 2, 3) is in the plane. To get a normal, cross the two other vectors in your parametric equation, (1, 1, 0) and (2, 1, -1). The cross product will give you a vector (A, B, C). The equation of the plane will be A(x - 1) + B(y - 2) + C(z - 3) = 0.

What I've described is probably a bit more complicated, but has the advantage of helping you comprehend the plane geometrically.
 
Oh, thanks very much!
Yes, I know how to do it by finding the normal using the cross product, I just wasn't sure how to solve those set of equations.
 
Just out of curiosity, I tried the method you suggested:

direction vectors of the plane (vectors parallel to the plane) are:

u = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\1\\0\end{ar ray}\right) and v = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}2\\1\\-1\end{ar ray}\right)

so that a normal vector is u ×v (cross product) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\-1\\-1\end{ar ray}\right)

So the cartesian equation is -x - 13y −z = d, satisfying any point on the plane. For example if I substitute a point on the plane (1,2,3), [which is the position vector];

-1-2-3 = d
d = -6

=> -x - 13y −z = -6

But this is different from what we got previously, x–y+z=2. Why is it different?
Thanks again!
 
roam said:
Just out of curiosity, I tried the method you suggested:

direction vectors of the plane (vectors parallel to the plane) are:

u = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1\\1\\0\end{ar ray}\right) and v = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}2\\1\\-1\end{ar ray}\right)

so that a normal vector is u ×v (cross product) = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}-1\\-1\\-1\end{ar ray}\right)
??Certainly not! Where in the world would you get the "13" from? The cross product Of \vec{i}+ \vect{j} and 2\vec{i}+ \vec{j}- \vec{k} is -\vec{i}+ \vec{j}- \vec{k} or \vec{i}- \vec{j}+ \vec{k}} depending on the order of multiplication.

So the cartesian equation is -x - 13y −z = d, satisfying any point on the plane. For example if I substitute a point on the plane (1,2,3), [which is the position vector];

-1-2-3 = d
d = -6

=> -x - 13y −z = -6

But this is different from what we got previously, x–y+z=2. Why is it different?
Thanks again![/QUOTE]
 
??Certainly not! Where in the world would you get the "13" from?

oops there was a typo in my previous post...so I'll start over.

I want the general cartesian equation of the plane, Ax+By+Cz = D

I found the cross product of the two direction vectors;

\left(\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\1&1&0\\2&1&-1\end{ar ray}\right)

i \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0\\1&-1\end{ar ray}\right), -j \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0\\2&-1\end{ar ray}\right), k \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&1\\2&1\end{ar ray}\right)

Cross Product = (-1,-1,-1)

The cartesian equation is -x-y-z = D

To find a D I just substitute point (1,2,3)
-1-2-3 = -6

Therefore => -x-y-z = -6

But the problem is that this is different from the equation we obtained previously, x–y+z=2. Why is that? I don't understand it.
 
roam said:
oops there was a typo in my previous post...so I'll start over.

I want the general cartesian equation of the plane, Ax+By+Cz = D

I found the cross product of the two direction vectors;

\left(\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\1&1&0\\2&1&-1\end{ar ray}\right)

i \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0\\1&-1\end{ar ray}\right), -j \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0\\2&-1\end{ar ray}\right), k \left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&1\\2&1\end{ar ray}\right)

Cross Product = (-1,-1,-1)
No, the "j" determinant is not 1, so the "j" component is not -1.

The cartesian equation is -x-y-z = D

To find a D I just substitute point (1,2,3)
-1-2-3 = -6

Therefore => -x-y-z = -6

But the problem is that this is different from the equation we obtained previously, x–y+z=2. Why is that? I don't understand it.
 
  • #10
I understand. It's (-1,1,-1)

=> -x+y-z = -2

Why is it different from the other equation we obtained (y+z=2)? It is still a multiple of that equation. It looks like it has been multiplied through by -1.
 
  • #11
-x + y -z = -2 is different from x + y + z = 6. Geometrically they represent different planes in R^3.
 
  • #12
I know! I'm talking about -x+y-z = -2 VS x–y+z=2 ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K