Undergrad Converting Planck data for spherical projection

Click For Summary
To convert Planck data from an oval shape to a spherical projection, users need to obtain raw FITS files from the Planck website, specifically focusing on maps between 70GHz and 217GHz. Visualization software, such as the NASA Sky Viewer, can display the data on a sphere, but it may not allow for exporting a 2D map suitable for 3D applications. There is no widely known software available for converting FITS files to a format that directly supports full spherical surface projection. Users with programming skills might be able to create a custom solution for this conversion. Overall, while visualization options exist, exporting the data for 3D applications remains a challenge.
localstarlight
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how I could convert data from Planck, which appear as an oval shape, into a form that I can easily map onto a sphere (ie. a rectangular shape in 2:1 aspect ratio)?

Here is an example Planck image: http://sci.esa.int/science-e-media/img/61/Planck_CMB_Mollweide_4k.jpg

I see that NASA have something called 'Science on a Sphere' where they have taken similar data (ie. WMAP) and managed to project it onto a sphere (see here), so it must be possible!

Does anyone know the process for this?

Thanks!
 
Space news on Phys.org
You'd have to get the raw FITS files from the Planck website:
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/Planck/release_2/all-sky-maps/

These are the raw maps for each frequency. I'd suggest looking at maps from 70GHz - 217GHz for looking at the CMB. Use the full mission maps (top row).

Or, if you just want to look at the CMB (with foreground signals subtracted):
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/P..._CMB_IQU-commander_1024_R2.02_full/index.html

You'd then need a program to visualize them. Here's one, though it may not be easy to install unless you're familiar with Linux:
https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/tb_skyviewer_ov.cfm
 
Chalnoth said:
You'd have to get the raw FITS files from the Planck website:
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/Planck/release_2/all-sky-maps/

These are the raw maps for each frequency. I'd suggest looking at maps from 70GHz - 217GHz for looking at the CMB. Use the full mission maps (top row).

Or, if you just want to look at the CMB (with foreground signals subtracted):
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/P..._CMB_IQU-commander_1024_R2.02_full/index.html

You'd then need a program to visualize them. Here's one, though it may not be easy to install unless you're familiar with Linux:
https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/toolbox/tb_skyviewer_ov.cfm

Thanks! This is very helpful!

Is that viewer able to export a 2D map that I can then project onto a sphere in a 3D application though? From the description it sounds like you can view it on a sphere inside the program, but not necessarily export what I'm after.

Thanks again for your help.
 
localstarlight said:
Thanks! This is very helpful!

Is that viewer able to export a 2D map that I can then project onto a sphere in a 3D application though? From the description it sounds like you can view it on a sphere inside the program, but not necessarily export what I'm after.

Thanks again for your help.
I'm not familiar with any software to convert FITS to any other format that stores data for the full surface of the sphere for the purpose of projecting in 3D, unfortunately.

I know roughly how you could write such a program, but that solution will only work if you're a programmer.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K