Converting Redshift to Velocity: The Accurate Formula Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redshift Velocity
TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
What is the formula used to convert the measured redshift into a velocity?, not the approximated formula for low speeds v=cz , but the more general and accurate one.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TrickyDicky said:
What is the formula used to convert the measured redshift into a velocity?, not the approximated formula for low speeds v=cz , but the more general and accurate one.

Thanks.
Do you want the answer for special relativity or cosmology or both?
 
Passionflower said:
Do you want the answer for special relativity or cosmology or both?

For cosmology, the one used to get a velocity from the redshift and plug it in the Hubble Law formula.
 
TrickyDicky said:
For cosmology, the one used to get a velocity from the redshift and plug it in the Hubble Law formula.

I think , this is the one

v=[((1+z)^2-1)/((1+z)^2+1)]c=Ho*D

c=light speed constant
Ho=Hubble constant
D=distance
v=velocity
 
TrickyDicky said:
I think , this is the one

v=[((1+z)^2-1)/((1+z)^2+1)]c=Ho*D

c=light speed constant
Ho=Hubble constant
D=distance
v=velocity

No, this isn't correct. See section 3 from

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808.

It is fairly easy to derive equation (1) from this paper.
 
TrickyDicky said:
I think , this is the one

v=[((1+z)^2-1)/((1+z)^2+1)]c=Ho*D

c=light speed constant
Ho=Hubble constant
D=distance
v=velocity

I don't think it is correct. For zero density universe it is:

v=H_{0}D

D=(c/H_{0})ln(1+z)
 
George Jones said:
No, this isn't correct. See section 3 from

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808.

It is fairly easy to derive equation (1) from this paper.

The one I wrote is exactly equation (2) from that paper.

Calimero said:
I don't think it is correct. For zero density universe it is:

v=H_{0}D

D=(c/H_{0})ln(1+z)
This is not exactly what I wanted. I asked for the way to translate from z to velocity for high z or at least >1, this must be a very common formula for cosmologists, I'd say.
The formula I used maybe is not correct for the Hubble law but I'm interested in the first part, express v as a function of z, is that so difficult?
 
Ok, I see what you mean, after looking at the paper and the formula again, I see what you mean, but according to some cosmologists the formula that doesn't give superluminal velocities is alright too, and anyway this is a cosmology debate that I find artificial and tiresome and I don't really want to get into it , I think it's been discussed enough in these forums, just remember that people as prestigious as David Hogg supports the view of cosmological redshift as Doppler.
 
  • #10
TrickyDicky said:
The one I wrote is exactly equation (2) from that paper.

Yes, but this is not the correct equation to use for cosmology.
Calimero said:
I don't think it is correct. For zero density universe it is:

v=H_{0}D

D=(c/H_{0})ln(1+z)

This expression and the expression that TrickyDicky gave in post #5 are both true in special relativity, i.e., in an empty universe. The conventions used for distance, however, are different in posts #5 and #7, and this leads to differing expressions for speed.
 
  • #11
George Jones said:
This expression and the expression that TrickyDicky gave in post #5 are both true in special relativity, i.e., in an empty universe. The conventions used for distance, however, are different in posts #5 and #7, and this leads to differing expressions for speed.

Yes, for empty universe D=(c/H_{0})ln(1+z) gives distance that goes into Hubble's law. Equation (1) you pointed at is general one, and \dot{R} would depend on particular values of \Omega_{\lambda} and \Omega_{m} you choose.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
TrickyDicky said:
...and anyway this is a cosmology debate that I find artificial and tiresome and I don't really want to get into it , I think it's been discussed enough in these forums, just remember that people as prestigious as David Hogg supports the view of cosmological redshift as Doppler.


What debate?

TrickyDicky said:
What is the formula used to convert the measured redshift into a velocity?, not the approximated formula for low speeds v=cz , but the more general and accurate one.

TrickyDicky said:
For cosmology, the one used to get a velocity from the redshift and plug it in the Hubble Law formula.
 
Back
Top