Converting the Laplacian into polar coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting the Laplacian operator from Cartesian to polar coordinates in two dimensions. The original poster expresses difficulty in applying the chain rule to compute second derivatives and seeks assistance in this process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule for first and second derivatives, with specific examples provided. There is mention of using the product rule during differentiation. Some participants also question the choice of variables (theta vs. phi) in the context of polar coordinates.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the differentiation process and the relationships between variables. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in the variable representation, and one participant indicates they will attempt the problem again after further consideration.

Contextual Notes

There is a note that the original poster is working under homework constraints, which may limit the information they can provide or the methods they can use. The discussion also highlights potential confusion regarding the notation for polar coordinates.

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
I need to convert the Laplacian in two dimensions to polar coordinates.

\nabla^2 u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}

I am having problems with computing the second derivatives using the chain rule. For example, the first derivative with respect to x would be..
\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}

I don't know where to go from here to compute the second derivative. Would I need to use the product rule on each term when differentiating again? By the way, the answer is..

\nabla^2 u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\phi^2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help me with this??
 
Xyius said:
I need to convert the Laplacian in two dimensions to polar coordinates.

\nabla^2 u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}

I am having problems with computing the second derivatives using the chain rule. For example, the first derivative with respect to x would be..
\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}
That should be
\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}~~(1)

Polar coordinates are given in r and θ (theta) rather than r and φ (phi).

And the other partial would be
\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y}~~(2)

To get \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}
and
\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}

take the partial with respect to x of (1), above, and take the partial with respect to y of (2), above. To do this you'll need to use the product rule and the chain rule.

It might be helpful to make a diagram showing the relationship between u, r, θ, and x and y.

Code:
...u
../.\ 
r...θ
|...|
x...y
What I'm attempting to show here is that the relationship between u and x involves paths through both r and θ; namely, u to r, then r to x, and also u to θ, and then θ to x.

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}

It's similar for the partial of u with respect to y.


Xyius said:
I don't know where to go from here to compute the second derivative. Would I need to use the product rule on each term when differentiating again? By the way, the answer is..

\nabla^2 u=\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial\phi^2}
 
Theta and Phi are just dummy variables, my chain rule isn't less correct because of the fact that I used a different variable. I just happen to like Phi better than theta.

Anyway, I haven't gotten a chance to try this again, as soon as I try it ill report back.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K