Converting Tricky Parametric Equations into a Single Function | Tips & Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gagle The Terrible
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametric
Gagle The Terrible
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I would like to convert these parametric equations into a single
f(x,y) = 0 function.

X(t) = t^2 + t + 1
Y(t) = t^2 - t +1

In fact, what stops me is the imaginary roots of the parametric polynomials.

Is there a way to get around the seemingly impossible explicit solving of the quadratics to isolate either X or Y ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that x - t = y + t (or just subtract y(t) from x(t)).
 
Last edited:
Gagle The Terrible said:
I would like to convert these parametric equations into a single
f(x,y) = 0 function.

X(t) = t^2 + t + 1
Y(t) = t^2 - t +1

In fact, what stops me is the imaginary roots of the parametric polynomials.

Is there a way to get around the seemingly impossible explicit solving of the quadratics to isolate either X or Y ?

First note that X - Y = 2t, but also notice that these are both quadratic equations so you can solve one of them or the other to find t in terms of X or Y and then substitute this into X - Y = 2t or the equation for the other variable.
 
You just want to substitute t = (x - y) / 2. There's no need to solve any quadratics.
 
0rthodontist said:
You just want to substitute t = (x - y) / 2. There's no need to solve any quadratics.

Darn, I guess I should have seen that since I did notice that x - y = 2t.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top