Convex Function on Many variables on an interval

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the function f(x) = x1x2 is convex on the interval [a, ma]T, where a ≥ 0 and m ≥ 1. The definition of convexity is provided, emphasizing the relationship between points x and y in the context of multiple variables. Participants express uncertainty about applying the convexity condition to multiple variables and the significance of the interval [a, ma]T. Clarification is sought regarding the interpretation of this interval, with suggestions that it represents points in R2. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of convex functions in higher dimensions.
curiousguy23
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that f(x) = x1x2 is a convex function on [a,ma]T where a \geq 0
and m \geq 1.


Homework Equations


By definition f is convex iff

\forall x,y\in \Re \quad \wedge \quad \forall \lambda :\quad 0\le \lambda \le 1\quad \Rightarrow \quad f\left( \lambda x+(1-\lambda )y \right) \le \lambda f\left( x \right) +(1-\lambda )f\left( y \right)


The Attempt at a Solution



I am not really sure how to go about this. Firstly I was thinking on how to apply the above relation to multiple variables. I would assume that it applies in general and in this case x and y would be a vector of variables, but I still don't know how the proof follows. Also I am not sure is how the interval [a,ma]T plays into the equation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
curiousguy23 said:

Homework Statement


Show that f(x) = x1x2 is a convex function on [a,ma]T where a \geq 0
and m \geq 1.


Homework Equations


By definition f is convex iff

\forall x,y\in \Re \quad \wedge \quad \forall \lambda :\quad 0\le \lambda \le 1\quad \Rightarrow \quad f\left( \lambda x+(1-\lambda )y \right) \le \lambda f\left( x \right) +(1-\lambda )f\left( y \right)


The Attempt at a Solution



I am not really sure how to go about this. Firstly I was thinking on how to apply the above relation to multiple variables. I would assume that it applies in general and in this case x and y would be a vector of variables, but I still don't know how the proof follows. Also I am not sure is how the interval [a,ma]T plays into the equation.

What is meant by [a,ma]T? I doubt that [a,ma] is a 1-dimensional interval, because what in the world would possibly be meant by the transpose of an interval? My guess would be that [a,ma] means a point in R2 of the form x1 = a, x2 = ma. However, that is just a guess.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
What is meant by [a,ma]T? I doubt that [a,ma] is a 1-dimensional interval, because what in the world would possibly be meant by the transpose of an interval? My guess would be that [a,ma] means a point in R2 of the form x1 = a, x2 = ma. However, that is just a guess.

RGV

Yes you are right in this, sorry I did not stipulate this, x1= a and x2=ma=mx1
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K