Understanding Convolution in Discrete Time: Solving the Homework Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the convolution of the discrete time function h_2(n) = δ(n) + δ(n-1) with itself. The original poster struggles with the convolution process and expresses confusion about the correct calculation. A participant points out that the convolution should be calculated using the formula (h_2 * h_2)(n) = Σ h_2(k) h_2(n-k), highlighting a misunderstanding in the initial approach. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted acknowledgment of the mistake and a sense of relief. Understanding the proper convolution method is essential for solving similar problems in discrete time systems.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
The following is all in discrete time, n is an integer

We are given that:
h_2(n) = \delta ( n ) + \delta ( n-1 )

I want to find the convolution of h2[n]*h2[n].

I don't really understand how to solve this properly.

So,
y(n) = \Sigma_{k=-\infty}^{k=\infty} (\delta(n)+\delta(n-1)) \times (\delta(n-k)+\delta(n-k-1))

So the (\delta(n)+\delta(n-1)) pulls out because it is constant.

So,

y(n) = (\delta(n)+\delta(n-1)) \Sigma_{k=-\infty}^{k=\infty} \delta(n-k)+\delta(n-k-1)

How do I even solve this?
The book gets
h_2(n)*h_2(n) = \delta(n) + \2\delta(n-1) + \delta(n-2)

I don't understand how they get this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FrogPad said:
y(n) = \Sigma_{k=-\infty}^{k=\infty} (\delta(n)+\delta(n-1)) \times (\delta(n-k)+\delta(n-k-1))

So the (\delta(n)+\delta(n-1)) pulls out because it is constant.

You are not calculating the convolution correctly.

(h_2\ast h_2)(n) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}\cdot h_2(k) h_2(n-k)
 
omg...

haha


I'm going to to take a walk. That was a ridiculous mistake.

thanks man :)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K