Cool ways to use the Pythagorean Theorem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
30 replies · 4K views
Hatesmondays
Messages
17
Reaction score
7
What are some cool things that people can do with the Pythagorean Theorem?
latex.php?latex=a%5E2+%2B+b%5E2+%3D+c%5E2+&bg=ffffff&fg=2b2b2b&s=3.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The last time I used it was to find the "normal lens" for my cameras.

Here's the wiki article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_lens

Basically, the "normal" lens for any given camera is that lens which is middle of the road, being neither wide angle nor telephoto. What focal length that is for any given camera is dictated by the film or sensor size. It is that focal length which is equal to the length of the diagonal of the format or sensor. Knowing the sensor width and height, it is a simple matter to use Pythagorean theorem to find the diagonal.
 
Hatesmondays said:
Pythagorean Theorem
The theorem states that:

"The square on the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares on the two legs"
Here are 109 other proofs: http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/
There are at least 370 of them, according to wiki. Including one by U.S. President James Garfield.
Hence, finding new proofs are a cool thing to do. Q.E.D.
 
Enigman said:
There are at least 370 of them, according to wiki. Including one by U.S. President James Garfield.
Hence, finding new proofs are a cool thing to do. Q.E.D.
Would it be possible, using certain foundational results in mathematics or logic that I am shamefully unaware of, to establish an upper bound on the number of different proofs? (For this one of course first has to specify when two proofs are considered "different".)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
I used it (iteratively) to generate π once.
 
Hatesmondays said:
What are some cool things that people can do with the Pythagorean Theorem?
latex.php?latex=a%5E2+%2B+b%5E2+%3D+c%5E2+&bg=ffffff&fg=2b2b2b&s=3.png
The sum of the squares of the standard deviations of two independent random variable is equal to the square of the standard deviation of their sum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
Hatesmondays said:
What are some cool things that people can do with the Pythagorean Theorem?
latex.php?latex=a%5E2+%2B+b%5E2+%3D+c%5E2+&bg=ffffff&fg=2b2b2b&s=3.png

I like that works with any number of dimensions. a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + ... + y^2 = z^2

It is even used in infinite dimensions, with the proviso that the sum has to be finite.
 
Hornbein said:
I like that works with any number of dimensions. a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + ... + y^2 = z^2

It is even used in infinite dimensions, with the proviso that the sum has to be finite.
I like that one.
 
I've been working with Power Factor a lot lately in my EE work. The Pythagorean Theorem comes up in the vector addition of Real and Reactive Power:

http://www.rbgrant.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Power-Factor-Correction-2.jpg
http://www.rbgrant.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Power-Factor-Correction-2.jpg

http://www.rapidtables.com/electric/electric_power.htm
Real / reactive / apparent powers relation
The real power P and reactive power Q give together the apparent power S:

P^2 + Q^2 = S^2

P is the real power in watts [W]

Q is the reactive power in volt-ampere-reactive [VAR]

S is the apparent power in Volt-amper [VA]
Power factor definition
The power factor is equal to the real or true power P in watts (W) divided by the apparent power |S| in volt-ampere (VA):

PF = P(W)/ |S(VA)|

PF - power factor.

P - real power in watts (W).

|S| - apparent power - the magnitude of the complex power in volt·amps (VA).

A power factor of 1.0 is ideal, and devices with input Power Factors < 1.0 are starting to have to use "Power Factor Correction" to bring up their low numbers... :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tiling a floor - Measure one side (A) at 10 feet and mark both ends, at one of the ends of A make a perpendicular arc 10 feet long. On the other end of A, measure 14.14 feet and scribe an arc to intersect with the first arc.
 
berkeman said:
I've been working with Power Factor a lot lately in my EE work. The Pythagorean Theorem comes up in the vector addition of Real and Reactive Power:

http://www.rbgrant.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Power-Factor-Correction-2.jpg
http://www.rbgrant.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Power-Factor-Correction-2.jpg
Ooh ooh, I remember this from physics! We used an inductor to improve efficiency! (decrease the non-doing reactive power)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
That is right! I'm am going to try to disprove it. On another site cuase this one doesn't allow new ideas.
 
Hatesmondays said:
That is right! I'm am going to try to disprove it. On another site cuase this one doesn't allow new ideas.

If you enjoy to disprove stuff that is true, I can give you some other suggestions:
- Disprove the theory of evolution (this is a popular one, googling will get you a lot of references!)
- Disprove germ theory
- Disprove gravity
- Disprove that Earth is round
- Disprove that 1+1=2
- Disprove you exist
 
micromass said:
If you enjoy to disprove stuff that is true, I can give you some other suggestions:
...
It is very easy to disprove the pythagorean theorem! First, bring a ball ...
Not going to finish the proof to avoid spoilers :biggrin:

Edit:
Although I suppose that an assumption of the theorem is that you are not allowed to bring a ball
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
micromass said:
- Disprove you exist

I exist?
 
Hatesmondays said:
I exist?
Hatesmondays said:
Boom there.
The fact that' you're even able to even ask that question proves [to you] that you exist. (Proves it to yourself, that is. It doesn't necessarily prove it to anybody else; that's a significantly more difficult problem. But if you're capable of asking yourself about your own existence, it proves to yourself that you exist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito_ergo_sum.)
 
micromass said:
I didn't ask to prove you exist, I asked to disprove you exist.

I don't think, therefore I am not.