Coordinate conjugate to momentum.

AI Thread Summary
In a system with one degree of freedom described by a Lagrangian L[x, \dot x], momentum is defined as p = ∂L/∂\dot x. A change of coordinates x to y leads to a new Lagrangian M[y, \dot y] and a corresponding momentum q = ∂M/∂\dot y. The discussion centers on finding the transformation from momenta p to q and how to reverse this process to derive the coordinate transformation from q back to p. It suggests that understanding canonical transformations and generating functions is essential for this process. Exploring resources like Wikipedia on canonical transformations is recommended for further clarity.
Petr Mugver
Messages
279
Reaction score
0
Let's take a system, for simplicity with only one degree of freedom, described by a certain lagrangian

L[x,\dot x]

I define the momentum

p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x}

Now, if I make a change of coordinates

x\longmapsto y\qquad\qquad\qquad(1)

I obtain a second lagrangian

M[y,\dot y]=L[x(y(t)),\partial_t x(y(t))]

and I can define a second momentum

q=\frac{\partial M}{\partial\dot y}

My question is, if instead of the transformation (1) I want to consider the transformation of the momenta

p\longmapsto q\qquad\qquad\qquad(2)

How can I find the corresponding transformation (1)? In other words, given that I know how to do (1)-->(2), how can I do (2)-->(1)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to read some material about canonical transformations.
Maybe wiki is a good start:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_transformation

Once you are on the starting block, read about generating functions.
The last section "Modern mathematical description" is like a summary.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top