Coordinate Transformation of the equation of continuity for a vaporizing droplet

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the coordinate transformation of the equation of continuity for a vaporizing liquid droplet, specifically transitioning from spherical coordinates to a new set of variables. Participants explore the implications of this transformation, the physical meaning behind varying density, and the role of the diffusion coefficient in the context of droplet vaporization and combustion theories.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on reproducing the transformation of the equation of continuity, specifically the first term.
  • Questions arise regarding the definition of the diffusion coefficient (D) and the reasons for density variations over time and space.
  • Another participant confirms that D is indeed the diffusion coefficient and explains that density varies due to mass changes at point r over time.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of dividing the variable tau by time, given that certain parameters are time-dependent.
  • One participant suggests that the density variation could be due to temperature changes or the presence of multiple components in the liquid phase.
  • A later reply introduces a mathematical approach to clarify the relationship between the total derivative and the missing term in the transformation.
  • Further clarification is provided that the continuity equation is part of a broader set of equations, including species conservation and energy conservation equations, which govern droplet behavior in different phases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physical interpretation of the density variations and the role of the diffusion coefficient. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the transformation and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the density changes are influenced by temperature variations and the presence of different species in the gas phase. There is uncertainty regarding the assumptions made in the transformation process and the implications of time-dependent variables.

kabaer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey there,

I trying to understand the following coordinate transformation of the equation of continuity (spherical coordinates) for a vaporizing liquid droplet\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} (r^2 \rho v) = 0 into \epsilon \sigma \frac{\partial \gamma}{\partial \sigma} + \frac{\partial \gamma}{\partial \tau} + \frac{1}{\sigma^2} \frac{\partial \mu}{\partial \sigma} = -\gamma \frac{\partial ln\rho_0}{\partial \tau} with \sigma=r/r_0,\\ \tau=\int \rho D/\rho_0 r_0^2\, dt,\\ \gamma=\rho/\rho_0,\\ \mu=r^2\rho v/r_0\rho D \\ \epsilon=-(r_0\rho_0/\rho D)dr_0/dtwhere \rho D=const. and subscript 0 means condition at the droplet surface.
This transformation comes from F.A. Williams "On the Assumptions Underlying Droplet Vaporization and Combustion Theories" J. Chem. Phys. 33, 133 (1960); doi: 10.1063/1.1731068

Actually I only have problems reproducing the first term, so I appreciate if someone can guide me through this transformation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some questions:

What is D, the diffusion coefficient?
Why is the density varying with time (and position?)?
 
Yes, D is the diffusion coefficient. The density is vary in time and space since it represents the mass at the point r in every instance t.

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \gamma\rho_0=\gamma \frac{\partial \rho_0}{\partial t}+\rho_0\frac{\partial \gamma}{\partial t}which may give the second term on the left and the one on the right by using \frac{d\tau}{dt}=\frac{\rho D}{\rho_0 r_0^2} But I'm not sure if I could only divide \tau \ \text{by}\ dt \text{, since}\ \rho_0 r_0^2\ \text{are both time dependent}However, I'm assumed that \tau=\int_0^\tau d\tauso that the former division should be valid, right?
For the \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2\rho v) I got \frac{1}{r_0 \sigma^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma}(\frac{r^2\rho v}{\rho D}) taking into account \frac{\rho D}{\rho_0 r_0^2} from the time derivative and ρD=const.. Thus leading to \frac{1}{r_0 \sigma^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma}(\frac{r^2\rho v}{\rho D})=\frac{1}{\sigma^2}[\frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma}\mu-\frac{r^2\rho v}{\rho D}\frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma}\frac{1}{r_0}]. The first term is in accordance with the third term on the left of the solution. However, I got headache getting the first term on the left of the solution from -\frac{r^2\rho v}{\rho D}\frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma}\frac{1}{r_0}
 
Last edited:
You still haven't adequately articulated for me what is actually going on here physically. I'm beginning to get the idea that you are making a change of variable to remap the drop radial coordinate, by scaling it by the instantaneous radius of the drop. I still don't know why the density is varying with time and position unless (a) the temperature is also changing or (b) you have more than one component in the liquid phase (only one of which is volatile). I'm also wondering why the diffusion coefficient is present in the overall mass balance equation, unless D represents the diffusion coefficient in the gas phase outside the drop.

You need to provide more details on this problem: fewer equations and more words.

Chet
 
I think I may be able to help. If f is a function of t and r, then

df=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_{\sigma}dt+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \sigma}\right)_{t}d\sigma
So, \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_r=\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_{\sigma}+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \sigma}\right)_{t}\left(\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial t}\right)_r
So,
\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_r=<br /> \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}\right)_{\sigma}<br /> -\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \sigma}\right)_{t}<br /> \frac{\sigma}{r_0} \frac{dr_0}{dt}

The second term here corresponds to your missing term.

Chet
 
Last edited:
Ok I'm sorry for that.
The continuity equation is only the simplest one of the transformed equations. The hole set of equations comprise in addition the "species conservation equation" and "energy conservation equation". These equations form the differential equations for a droplet vaporizing or burning in quiescent air.
The density is changing due to temperature changes (in the droplet as well as outside) and due to different species (only outside in the gas phase - the liquid contains only one component). The diffusion coefficient represents the value in the gas phase outside the droplet due to the different species (air for vaporizing case and products for burning case).
 
First of all, thank you very much dealing with this problem.
Of course, the total derivative will give the missing (first) term of the solution if I put df=d\gamma. But this leaves me with the residual partial derivatives, which are not in accordance with my former route of transformation. Maybe I did mistakes already before...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K