I Coriolis acceleration of a projectile launched at the equator

AI Thread Summary
Coriolis acceleration is not zero for a projectile launched from the equator at an angle; it only becomes zero when the launch angle is parallel to the surface. When a ball is launched at a 45-degree angle northward, its velocity vector is not parallel to the rotational vector, resulting in a measurable Coriolis effect. The standard formula for calculating Coriolis acceleration supports this, indicating that deflections occur even at the equator for angled launches. Long-range ballistic travel is affected by this Coriolis acceleration, leading to significant lateral deviations. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate long-range projectile calculations.
jk185
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the Coriolis acceleration experienced by a projectile launched from the surface of a rotating body.

Say a ball is launched at 45 degree angle relative to the surface at some initial velocity v0. Let's further specify that the ball is launched due north from the equator (i.e. latitude = 0). I want to calculate the Coriolis acceleration (and its x, y, z components) that is experienced by the ball. Since the launch occurs at the equator, most would say that the Coriolis acceleration is zero, but is this true? Isn't the Coriolis acceleration only 0 at the equator since the launch angle is assumed to be 0 (i.e. the motion is parallel to the surface), meaning the velocity vector is parallel to the rotational vector? If a ball is launched at some angle relative the surface, the velocity vector is no longer parallel to the surface, meaning that there should actually be a Coriolis acceleration that is experienced by the ball.

Also, I am particularly interested in long-range ballistic travel.

Is there something that I am missing here? I have looked everywhere for an answer to this question but haven't found anything that specifically addresses this question.

Any help is appreciated here. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk185 said:
Isn't the Coriolis acceleration only 0 at the equator since the launch angle is assumed to be 0 (i.e. the motion is parallel to the surface), meaning the velocity vector is parallel to the rotational vector? If a ball is launched at some angle relative the surface, the velocity vector is no longer parallel to the surface, meaning that there should actually be a Coriolis acceleration that is experienced by the ball.
That seems to be what the standard formula for calculating the Coriolis acceleration ##a_C=2\vec{\Omega}\times\vec{v}## says, yes.
 
https://www.eugeneleeslover.com/USNAVY/FC-APPENDIX-B-8IN-55.html said:
1652974773254.png
Look at the Latitude 0 section and the columns for a target at 0 degrees (North) or 180 degrees (South). Look at the row for 30,000 yard range. A shot at those angles is deflected 42 yards left (west) when firing north and 42 yards right (west) when firing south. This is presumably due to Coriolis acting on the arching shot.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top