Coriolis acceleration of a projectile launched at the equator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Coriolis acceleration experienced by a projectile launched from the equator at a 45-degree angle. Contrary to common belief, Coriolis acceleration is not zero when the projectile is launched at an angle, as the velocity vector deviates from being parallel to the Earth's rotational vector. The standard formula for calculating Coriolis acceleration, a_C = 2\vec{\Omega} \times \vec{v}, confirms that a projectile launched northward will experience a deflection due to Coriolis effects, particularly noticeable over long-range ballistic travel, such as a 30,000-yard shot. This indicates that understanding the Coriolis effect is crucial for accurate long-range targeting.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coriolis acceleration and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with projectile motion and ballistic trajectories
  • Knowledge of vector mathematics and cross products
  • Basic principles of exterior ballistics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the Coriolis acceleration formula a_C = 2\vec{\Omega} \times \vec{v}
  • Research the effects of Coriolis acceleration on long-range artillery and ballistic calculations
  • Explore the impact of launch angles on projectile motion in relation to Earth's rotation
  • Investigate real-world applications of Coriolis effects in military and aerospace engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, military personnel involved in ballistics, and anyone interested in the effects of Earth's rotation on projectile motion.

jk185
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the Coriolis acceleration experienced by a projectile launched from the surface of a rotating body.

Say a ball is launched at 45 degree angle relative to the surface at some initial velocity v0. Let's further specify that the ball is launched due north from the equator (i.e. latitude = 0). I want to calculate the Coriolis acceleration (and its x, y, z components) that is experienced by the ball. Since the launch occurs at the equator, most would say that the Coriolis acceleration is zero, but is this true? Isn't the Coriolis acceleration only 0 at the equator since the launch angle is assumed to be 0 (i.e. the motion is parallel to the surface), meaning the velocity vector is parallel to the rotational vector? If a ball is launched at some angle relative the surface, the velocity vector is no longer parallel to the surface, meaning that there should actually be a Coriolis acceleration that is experienced by the ball.

Also, I am particularly interested in long-range ballistic travel.

Is there something that I am missing here? I have looked everywhere for an answer to this question but haven't found anything that specifically addresses this question.

Any help is appreciated here. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk185 said:
Isn't the Coriolis acceleration only 0 at the equator since the launch angle is assumed to be 0 (i.e. the motion is parallel to the surface), meaning the velocity vector is parallel to the rotational vector? If a ball is launched at some angle relative the surface, the velocity vector is no longer parallel to the surface, meaning that there should actually be a Coriolis acceleration that is experienced by the ball.
That seems to be what the standard formula for calculating the Coriolis acceleration ##a_C=2\vec{\Omega}\times\vec{v}## says, yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jk185
https://www.eugeneleeslover.com/USNAVY/FC-APPENDIX-B-8IN-55.html said:
1652974773254.png
Look at the Latitude 0 section and the columns for a target at 0 degrees (North) or 180 degrees (South). Look at the row for 30,000 yard range. A shot at those angles is deflected 42 yards left (west) when firing north and 42 yards right (west) when firing south. This is presumably due to Coriolis acting on the arching shot.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jk185

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
18K