Correct statement regarding nuclear reactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Reactions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding nuclear reactions, specifically evaluating statements related to decay processes and the nature of products resulting from such reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of multiple options regarding nuclear reactions, questioning the correctness of statements related to binding energy and the nature of decay products. Some express uncertainty about whether only specific products result from decay and the implications for momentum conservation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correctness of various options, with some participants expressing agreement on certain points while others seek clarification on their reasoning. The conversation reflects a mix of confidence and uncertainty regarding the details of nuclear decay and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a lack of familiarity with specific decay modes and the factors influencing half-life, indicating a need for further exploration of these concepts.

songoku
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
394
Homework Statement
Which of the following statements is correct?
a. If the total mass of the product of a reaction is greater, this reaction is impossible
b. When a stationary nucleus decays to produce a daughter nucleus and a gamma photon, the products always move off in opposite direction
c. The greater the binding energy of a nucleus, the more stable it is
d. although the half life of a radioactive substance is unaffected by changes in pressure, we can still change the half - life by allowing the substance to react chemically to produce a new radioactive compound
Relevant Equations
Not sure
Option A is wrong because the reaction is still possible but just can not happen spontaneously?

Option B is correct

Option C is wrong because it should be binding energy per nucleon

Option D is wrong because it should be nuclear reaction instead of chemical reaction?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"When a stationary nucleus decays to produce a daughter nucleus and a gamma photon, the products always move off in opposite direction"

Is it possible that those are the only products of the decay? (I really do not know... never studied this.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
"When a stationary nucleus decays to produce a daughter nucleus and a gamma photon, the products always move off in opposite direction"

Is it possible that those are the only products of the decay? (I really do not know... never studied this.)

Maybe in this question it is assumed only these two products are produced by the decay so they need to move in opposite direction so the momentum is conserved
 
songoku said:
Maybe in this question it is assumed only these two products are produced by the decay so they need to move in opposite direction so the momentum is conserved
Maybe.. or maybe you are supposed to realize there have to be other products, in which case...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
Maybe.. or maybe you are supposed to realize there have to be other products, in which case...
At first, I was sure that B is the correct answer. Are you saying that it is not correct?
 
songoku said:
At first, I was sure that B is the correct answer. Are you saying that it is not correct?
As I wrote, I am no expert on the topic, and was not aware of a decay mode that only has those two products. Since you seem unsure, I just Googled it. I now see there is a flavour of gamma decay that does just that, so I agree with option B.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Thank you very much
 
By the way @haruspex, are my reasoning for option A and D correct?
 
songoku said:
By the way @haruspex, are my reasoning for option A and D correct?
The answers are correct, but your reasoning for D could be a bit more convincing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #10
haruspex said:
The answers are correct, but your reasoning for D could be a bit more convincing.
Sorry but I do not know other more correct reasoning for option D
 
  • #11
songoku said:
Sorry but I do not know other more correct reasoning for option D
Try to explain why a chemical reaction would not alter the half life. What determines the half life?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #12
haruspex said:
Try to explain why a chemical reaction would not alter the half life. What determines the half life?
Sorry, I am not sure. I always think the value of half life is constant
 
  • #13
songoku said:
Sorry, I am not sure. I always think the value of half life is constant
Sure, but what does it depend on? Why does one atom species have a different half life from another?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #14
I am sorry for late reply

Sorry I do not know. Maybe it depends on mass and atomic number of the nuclei?

Thanks
 
  • #15
songoku said:
I am sorry for late reply

Sorry I do not know. Maybe it depends on mass and atomic number of the nuclei?

Thanks
Quite so. And do either of those change in a chemical reaction?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #16
haruspex said:
Quite so. And do either of those change in a chemical reaction?
I get it. Thank you very much haruspex
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K