Correctly combining two Quaternions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quaternions
Ed
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

I have a little problem which seems to be melting my brain. I have a (software) model which I wish to rotate based on the topography of the ground. I'm using two angles to represent the terrain - a "North" and "East" elevation (hopefully that's self explanatory).

Once I have the quaternions for these two angles, how to I *correctly* combine them? Unless I'm misunderstanding something, multiplying the quaternions would result in the same effect as performing one rotation and then the other - which I think would be wrong (they're non-commutative, being about perpendicular axes).

help? please? :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rotations aren't commutative either, which means the quaternions still represent what you want to do.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top