What is the difference between auto-correlation and cross-correlation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaddyab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
AI Thread Summary
Auto-correlation measures the correlation of a signal with itself at different time lags, while auto-variance refers to the variance of that signal. Cross-correlation assesses the correlation between two different signals, whereas cross-variance pertains to the variance of those two signals. The key distinction lies in normalization; correlations are derived from cross- or co-variances by dividing by the square root of the product of the variances of the variables involved. This normalization ensures that correlation values range between 0 and 1. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate data analysis in time series and signal processing.
Shaddyab
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between Auto-correlation and auto-variance?
The same for cross-correlation and cross-variance?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The essential difference in both cases is a matter of normalization. The correlations are obtained from the cross- or co- variances by dividing by the square root of the product of the variances of the individual variables being correlated. As a result the correlations are limited in magnitude to be between 0 and 1.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top