Cosmic Slow Down: Is Dark Energy Variable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skydivephil
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A recent paper suggests that the universe's acceleration is slowing down, potentially indicating that dark energy may be variable rather than a constant. The authors reference previous studies, including one by the well-cited Starobinsky, but skepticism remains regarding the robustness of their findings due to limited data and the authors' lack of prior publications. The discussion highlights the need for further investigation to determine the implications for the cosmological constant. Initial impressions suggest that the new paper may not significantly impact the current understanding of dark energy. Overall, the scientific community is advised to take a cautious approach as more evidence emerges.
skydivephil
Messages
470
Reaction score
9
A paper appeared on the arxiv today claiming that the acceleration of the universe is slowing down:

http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/1306.0779

they reference a few other papers also claiming to see the same thing.

How robust do we think these reuslts are? If so what does it mean for dark energy being something variable rather than a cosmological constant?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude on that one. Just as a BTW side observation you might want to look up the authors e.g.
http://inspirehep.net/author/V.H.Cardenas.1/
He's the one whose name I recognize (21 papers, avg. no. cites = 4.0 excl. self-cite)
The other two have no prior papers listed on Inspire.
========================

The paper they CITE is by Starobinsky et al. Starobinsky is well-known and that paper has over 100 cites.
http://inspirehep.net/record/816682?ln=en
http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:0903.5141

I thought it might be worth looking at the list of cites of the Staro. paper to see which recent papers have RESPONDED to it. I took a quick look and didn't see anything interesting. There was a 2011 paper by Starobinsky himself et al, but it was somewhat more reserved and tentative, or so I thought.

My impression FWIW is that nothing much has come of this so far.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Marcus, I guess that new paper is only out today so we shall see if anyone takes it seriously.
If it were to be confirmed what would it imply for the cosmological constant - not so constant after all? or could we explain the slow down via other effects?
 
Looking over the paper it seems to indicate a variable constant however they used a limitted data set, some of the reference sets were fairly old. So based exclusively on this article I wouldn't think it will go far but that is just my take on it.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top