Could a Black Hole be the cycle of Dark Matter powered by Dar Energy:?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea of black holes functioning as a cycle for dark matter, driven by dark energy. It suggests that dark energy could transport dark matter, with black holes pulling in dark matter and redistributing it. However, the consensus is that black holes, dark matter, and dark energy are fundamentally different concepts with no direct interaction. Dark energy operates on cosmic scales, while black holes are relatively small, and dark matter's nature remains largely unknown. Further research and understanding of these topics are encouraged for clarity.
MrPrescott.nz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Could a "Black Hole" be the cycle of "Dark Matter" powered by "Dar Energy:?

Could the "black hole" be like a cycle for "dark matter". So let's say "Dark Energy" is what transports "Dark Matter". So all a black whole is, is a huge amount of energy pulling in "Dark Matter" and pushing it out to the edge of the galaxy for it to repeat its cycle again. "Dark Energy" is the force that drives the gravity in " Dark Matter" itself. It is probably wrong but it makes more sense that there is a cycle and it is moving, not just energy sitting there not being used. "Dark Energy" is faster then light. Because Light can not escape the force of "Dark Energy". I am 14, home and sick, reading space books. Sorry if it sounds amateur.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, I'm sorry but all of that is very wrong. Black holes, have almost nothing to do with dark matter or dark energy, and dark energy and dark matter have nothing to do with each other.

Dark energy acts over very large scales - millions and millions of light years. Black holes are very tiny objects by comparison, and the two have no interaction.

Dark matter would fall into a black hole if it passed too close, but there's not enough known about what dark matter actually is to say if a black hole could form from dark matter (probably not).
 


You will probably want to hear it from an astrophysicist, but they have already accounted for black holes when they counted the mass of the galaxy. They have found that regular matter is at best 1/5 of the mass in our galaxy, and black holes are included in regular matter.
 


I would read up on each of those three topics a lot more. Even though they might sound similar, they are in fact all drastically different idea from one another. Just reading the wikipedia page would probably give you enough information to see where your informational gaps are.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top