Could hot dark matter be cold dark matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between hot dark matter (HDM) and cold dark matter (CDM), questioning whether HDM could cool and transition into CDM. Neutrinos are identified as the primary candidates for HDM, traveling close to the speed of light and decoupling from the universe before photons, resulting in them being colder than the cosmic microwave background radiation. While neutrinos contribute to the non-baryonic matter in the universe, they account for only about 5%, leaving much dark matter unexplained. The conversation emphasizes that the predominant component of dark matter must be cold to adequately explain cosmic structure formation. Ultimately, a mechanism for the fragmentation of structures is deemed necessary to align with observational data.
Rothiemurchus
Messages
203
Reaction score
1
Could hot dark matter be cold dark matter?
In other words did hdm cool and become cdm?
And could hdm moving at or close to the speed of light
exist beyond the most distant detected galaxies?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
wrt hot dark matter, the only candidates that I know that are considered are light neutrinos, and they travel very close to c, and I can't imagine any mechanism that made them to slow to low velocities to become CDM and return to their actual velocities. But this is not a "black or white", there are models in which is postulate the coexistence of cold and hot dark matter, for example the cold+hot dark matter model (CHDM model)
 
Neutrinos certainly are HDM, and there were plenty around well before galaxies formed.

Neutrinos decoupled from the rest of the universe (except for gravity, of course) well before photons did, so the relict neutrinos are considerably colder than the CMBR, ~1.8K IIRC. Even if at least one flavour of neutrino has the maximum mass allowed by the best observations to date, these 'cold' relict neutrinos are still moving around at very high speeds.

At some point, the universe will have expanded enough for the relict neutrinos to become 'warm'. While there is still some interest in neutrinos cosmologically, they don't attract the interest they did as they are such a minor constituent of the universe.
 
Non-baryonic ("dark") matter is estimated to be about 23% of the universe. Neutrinos (part of the non-baryonic) seems to be at most 5% of the universe so there is a lot of "dark" matter unaccounted for.
 
The term hot dark matter refers to particles which were relativistic at the time they decoupled from the rest of the components of the universe, whereas cold dark matter refers to particles which were non-relativistic at the time they decoupled.

In order to explain structure formation it is currently believed that the main component of dark matter must be cold. The relevant quantity is the size of the horizon when the particles become non-relativistic and the mass of these particles contained within this horizon size, since this mass will determine the minimum size in the density fluctuations (cutoff scale) -- i.e. the way these particles change the promordial power spectrum suppressing low powers.

Cosmic neutrinos (the usual canditate for hot dark matter) remained relativistic until late (low temperatures) because of their low mass. The cutoff corresponds to a scale similar to galaxy clusters. A subsequent mechanism for fragmentation of structures would be necessary to explain the observations.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top