Could matter and matter waves be derivable?

Physics news on Phys.org
Two EM waves, one propagating outwardly and one inwardly to a sink. Sounds like they're constructing anequivalent to advanced and retarded waves. Not exactly codswallop but not really too exciting either, for me.
 
Interesting feedback complexities - the matrix re-gilded?

The hypothesized spherical-mirror-like communication between 'particles'
seems to provide an interesting environment for information processing and signal broadcast/echo(n)-rebroadcast feedbacks.

Note that integrated echo(n)-rebroadcast feedbacks would occur mutually between all particles in the set in a very complex (and parallell-processor-powerful) feedback system of echoing and re-echoing waves.

It seems to suddenly open up the possibility the universe might be composed from a set of information processing elements, and simultaneously offer a powerful, maybe novel form of CPU design. (Have u noticed things are getting faster slower recently?).

FYI, it is possible to store information in a signal (send it to the moon and back, then detect, re-amplify and re-transmit (rewrite). Delay-lines were used as an early form of computer memory. Thus the system has memory as well as processing capability.

How would the expansion of the universe affect the ever-changing wave-profile of the whole 'organism' as it elaborated over time? Is the feedback processing likely to be at least partyl non-linear? Determinate or non-determinate?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top