Could our nose and lungs filter tiny paint pieces

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenny1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter Paint
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the ability of the human respiratory system to filter tiny paint particles, particularly in the context of asthma. The nasal hairs and mucus play crucial roles in filtering airborne materials, but smoking can damage these protective mechanisms. Particle size significantly influences the filtering efficiency, with larger particles being removed more effectively. The conversation also highlights the potential dangers of specific particles, such as asbestos and mold spores, which can exacerbate respiratory issues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of respiratory anatomy and function
  • Knowledge of asthma and its effects on the respiratory system
  • Familiarity with particle size and its impact on inhalation
  • Awareness of common airborne pollutants and their health implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of smoking on respiratory health
  • Learn about the filtration capabilities of the human respiratory system
  • Investigate the health risks associated with asbestos exposure
  • Explore the impact of mold spores on asthma and respiratory conditions
USEFUL FOR

Individuals with asthma, respiratory health professionals, environmental health researchers, and anyone concerned about the effects of airborne pollutants on lung health.

kenny1999
Messages
235
Reaction score
5
today I opened a package and unexpectedly there was a lot of tiny white pieces stuff flying out, like dust flying out from old books, but it's certainly not dust. I suspect it's paint pieces fallen from somewhere and don't understand how it gets to the package inside.

Could our nose and lungs filter these tiny paint pieces? Or will they get to our lungs or stay in our nose?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
kenny1999 said:
Could our nose and lungs filter these tiny paint pieces? Or will they get to our lungs or stay in our nose?

Not my favorite scenario as I have asthma!

We have tiny hairs in our nose and further down our respiratory system that help filter dust and other air borne material. We also produce mucus that can clear away anything that could hurt / infect our lungs. Smoking damages these hairs (just one of the bad things about smoking)

In asthma one can get an overreaction to these dust particles and produce a lot of mucus or initiate a serious of reaction that end up "tightening" the lungs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lung#Protection
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
pinball1970 said:
Not my favorite scenario as I have asthma!

We have tiny hairs in our nose and further down our respiratory system that help filter dust and other air borne material. We also produce mucus that can clear away anything that could hurt / infect our lungs. Smoking damages these hairs (just one of the bad things about smoking)

In asthma one can get an overreaction to these dust particles and produce a lot of mucus or initiate a serious of reaction that end up "tightening" the lungs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lung#Protection

How small is the size of the particles our nose can filter?
 
kenny1999 said:
Sometimes the information on the internet may not be bullet proof to be true. I need more answers.
Uh ... you ARE on the internet. I'll certainly grant you that this forum is more reliable than the average internet site, but for a question as simple as yours I think something like Wikipedia would be fine, and there are medical sites that have detailed info. My point is that it's a good idea to make some attempt on your own before asking questions here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, pinball1970 and BillTre
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/how_do.html This is the standard explanation for non-scientists.
A quick rundown on the article with some examples.

Note that particle size is a determinate on where and if the particles are deposited. Nasal inhalation filters out more larger particles than does inhaling mouth open. Particle density (number of particles per cm3) in the air inhaled obviously is also a determining factor in how much of a "dose" of something is not expelled, but retained.

The major issue is: what type of particle?
Kind:
Example bad news would be something like fine Chrysolite particles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos. This very unlikley. Asbestos is a no-no for packaging in most countries.
It was commonly used in auto brake pad linings, so auto repair personnel were exposed to asbestos.
(Black) Mold spores are another problem. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC145304/
Ordinary household mold spores - not a big problem - per same article from NIH.

Size: larger particles are removed more efficiently. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6034084/ This shows how particle size and type can exacerbate existing pulmonary problems.

We have subdued this topic nicely. Thanks everyone for posting.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic, BillTre and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K