Could the lattice constants of ZnO affect the unit cell volume calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter drizzle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative Volume
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the relative occupied volume of the ZnO unit cell, with one user reporting a value of 43.3% based on their calculations, while another source cites 40%. The user questions the accuracy of their volume calculation, which uses lattice constants for a tetragonal structure, while ZnO actually has a wurtzite (hexagonal) structure, affecting the unit cell volume. Additionally, the ionic radius of Zn is noted to be inaccurately represented with only one significant figure, suggesting that more precise input values are necessary for accurate results. The conversation highlights the importance of referencing sources and understanding crystal structure when calculating unit cell volumes.
drizzle
Gold Member
Messages
200
Reaction score
58
hey everyone,
I’m a bit confused, I’m trying to calculate the relative occupied volume of ZnO unit cell, I’ve just calculated that Zn and O atoms occupy about 43.3% of the unit cell, there are 4 atoms per unit cell 2 for each one, although I doubt this value, does it varies or is it a constant value for ZnO, cause I found that Zn and O atoms occupy 40% from an article, the process I did to get this value is as follows:
Lattice constants: a=0.32495 nm, c=0.52069 nm
Ion radiuses: Zn =0.6 Å, O=1.38 Å
Spheres volume: Zn=9.0432E-31 m^3, O=1.10029E-29 m^3
Unit cell volume (Vu)=a^2*c=5.4981E-29 m^3
Total spheres volume (Vt)= 2*V(Zn)+2*V(O)= 2.38144E-29 m^3
The relative occupied V=[(Vt)/(Vu)]*100=43.3%

Another question please;
I found from some source that lattice constants of ZnO are given as: a = 0.3250 nm, c = 0.5207 nm and the unit cell volume of 47.63*10^-30 m^3. this volume is not calculated from the lattice constants where it is 5.5E-29 m^3, how was the unit cell volume calculated?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, a few things:

What's the crystal structure of ZnO? I didn't think it was tetragonal. a^2*c is only the volume for a tetragonal cell, if it's hexagonal or some other structure where the lattice vectors are not orthogonal, then you need to take that into consideration. That is probably why your volume calculation is different in your last question.

One of your inputs, the ionic radius of Zn has only one significant figure? Your final result, to one significant figure is 40%. If you want more accurate output you should first get more precise input. Typing "ionic radius zinc" into google gives me a value of 0.74 angstroms.

Ionic radii should not be taken too seriously, as in a crystal you will always have some degree of covalent bonding.

Edit: Oh, and if you're going to put numbers from an article, you should provide a reference to the article so other people can look at it. If they used different numbers or a different method, I can't help you figure something like that out without having access to the article.
 
yes, ZnO exhibits a wurtzite (hexagonal) structure, and its unit cell have 4 atoms as I described, what is the relation to calculate the unit cell volume, if my calculation is not right?


For the other question the values were taken from “Colloquiums tasks for Dielectrics- Solution” you can type it into google, it also has a sketch the unit cell. Thanks
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
981
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
6K