Could the probability distribution itself be quantised?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantization of probability distributions in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the multiverse interpretation. It asserts that while quantum decisions may lead to universe splitting, this does not imply that the wave function is inherently quantized. Key points include the distinction between continuous phenomena in quantum mechanics and misconceptions regarding the nature of quantum probability waves. The conversation emphasizes that space and time may be quantized, but this remains a hypothesis rather than an established fact.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of quantum measurement and quantization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics
  • Study the properties of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore continuous versus discrete phenomena in quantum systems
  • Investigate current hypotheses regarding the quantization of space and time
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum theory and the implications of the multiverse interpretation.

Robert Webb
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
The quantum multiverse would require infinite splitting for the probability function to be perfectly smooth, wouldn't it?
Everything is quantised when you look at it close enough. What about quantum probability waves themselves?

If the quantum multiverse interpretation were true, then each quantum decision leads to a splitting of the universe. But this isn't a binary choice, it's a probability distribution. For that graph to be smooth, the universe would have to split infinitely many times at each collapse of the wave function, wouldn't it?

So far we haven't encountered any true infinities in our universe. Space and time are probably quantised, not true continuums. What about the quantum wave function itself? I only have a lay person's understanding of any of this, but as I understand it, the multiverse interpretation says that rather than a quantum decision being random, all options are pursued, and interact with each other somehow to produce the wave function. But unless the splitting is infinite, this function wouldn't be perfectly smooth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robert Webb said:
Everything is quantised when you look at it close enough.

This is not correct, though it is a common misconception. There are plenty of phenomena in quantum mechanics that are continuous, not discrete. A simple example is the energy and momentum of a free particle.

Robert Webb said:
What about quantum probability waves themselves?

The wave function is continuous.

Robert Webb said:
If the quantum multiverse interpretation were true, then each quantum decision leads to a splitting of the universe.

This is another common misconception that is not correct. We have plenty of threads on the MWI that discuss why; going into detail about that is probably better handled by starting a separate thread on that topic (preferably after spending some time reading previous threads on the topic).

Robert Webb said:
this isn't a binary choice, it's a probability distribution

That depends on the specific measurement; for measurements where the results are quantized, there can indeed be a binary choice--a simple example is a spin measurement on a spin-1/2 particle.

Robert Webb said:
Space and time are probably quantised, not true continuums.

"Probably" is way too strong given our current state of knowledge. It's a hypothesis, which at this point we can't to much to investigate, that's all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K