Couldn't understand the way the problem is solved regarding resistivit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ein Krieger
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Ein Krieger
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was observing the solution of the following problem below:

765fa3055a66.png


Below it says that reducing the cross-sectional area of the wire triples its length. However, according to cross-sectional area equation A=pi*r^2 we observe that reduction of area only leads to reduction of radius .

Is there a mistake or I have some gaps in knowledge regarding above mentioned relationship?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In the original configuration there is some fixed mass of wire. After stretching will there not be the same mass of wire? You need to make the wire longer to compensate for the loss in radius.

The wires mass before+
mass= ρ*Volume. the volume = A*L
so
Mass = ρAL

I will now let you find the length after stretching.