MHB Coulomb's Law: Find Force of 4.0 & 6.0 $\mu C$ Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{18.3.6 Coulomb's Law }$
$\text{A charge of $q_1=4.0 \mu \, C$ is at origin, and charge}$
$\text{$q_2=6.0 \mu \, C$ is on the x-axis at $x=3.0 m$ }$,
$\text{(a) find the force on the charge $q_2$ } $
$\text{(b) find the force on $q_1$ } $
$\text{(c) how would your answer for parts (a) and (b) dffer if $q_2=-6.0 \mu \, C $ }$

ok I plan to take physics 151this fall
so trying to do some expected problems early
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\tiny{18.3.6 Coulomb's Law }$
$\text{A charge of $q_1=4.0 \mu \, C$ is at origin, and charge}$
$\text{$q_2=6.0 \mu \, C$ is on the x-axis at $x=3.0 m$ }$,
$\text{(a) find the force on the charge $q_2$ } $
$\text{(b) find the force on $q_1$ } $
$\text{(c) how would your answer for parts (a) and (b) dffer if $q_2=-6.0 \mu \, C $ }$

ok I plan to take physics 151this fall
so trying to do some expected problems early
Start with Coulomb's law!

[math]F = \dfrac{k q_1 q_2}{r^2}[/math] or [math]F = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \dfrac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}[/math]

(Hint: The force on q1 is the same as the force on q2. Why?)

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top