Coulomb's Law: Maximum Force & Distance?

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's law states that the electric force between two charges is influenced by the distance between them, increasing as they approach. When two charged objects, like spheres, touch, the maximum force occurs at the distance equal to the sum of their radii. The discussion emphasizes that real charged objects have size and shape, unlike ideal point charges. To accurately calculate the force when charges are in contact, one must consider the integral form of Coulomb's law, which accounts for the charge distribution and geometry. For spherically shaped charges, the distance between their centers is indeed the correct measurement when they are stuck together.
Mohammed Alqadhi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
According to Coulomb's law, the electric force between two, equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, charges depends on the distance between them, and as they get close to each other, the force increases and the distance decreases. At the position when they get stuck with each other, the force will be maximum, but what would the distance be?
My approach is that it will be the distance between the two centers of the two charges, is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohammed Alqadhi said:
According to Coulomb's law, the electric force between two, equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, charges depends on the distance between them, and as they get close to each other, the force increases and the distance decreases. At the position when they get stuck with each other, the force will be maximum, but what would the distance be?
My approach is that it will be the distance between the two centers of the two charges, is that correct?
Charge is property of bodies and particles, it does not exist by itself. You can not speak about the distance between charges.
If you have two charged spheres,and they get stuck, the distance between the centers is equal to the sum of the radii of the spheres.
 
Coulomb's law in the common form that you're using is for point charges, idealized objects with no size at all. Thus, no matter how close they are to one another, your charges won't touch and stick together.

Of course no real charged object is an ideal point particle; it has to have a surface and some size and shape. If you bring two of these close enough to touch, you'll have to use the more complicated integral form of Coulomb's law (google for "Coulomb's law integral") to calculate the force between them, and to do that you need to know the shape of both objects and how the charge is distributed within them.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Actually, the experiment was two charged balloons brought to stick on each other after hanging them over a rod using two strings with the same length, and they also brought to be in an equilibrium condition, in which we found the electric forces using Newton laws. But, when I wanted to measure the charges on the balloons
(assuming they have equal charges) I got confused about the distance between them as they are stuck?
So, I assumed it will the distance between their centers.
 
Mohammed Alqadhi said:
My approach is that it will be the distance between the two centers of the two charges, is that correct?
Yes, that is correct for spherically shaped charges (which from context is what I believe that you are considering)
 
  • Like
Likes Mohammed Alqadhi
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top