Coulomb's Law problem: Charged particles and the net electric field and force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a Coulomb's Law problem involving three charged particles, specifically focusing on calculating the charge of particle 2 (q2) based on the forces exerted by particles 1 and 3. Particle 1 has a charge of |q1| = 19e, and particle 3 has a charge of q3 = +16e. The net electrostatic force on particle 2 is given as F2,net = 0.8688 × 10-25 N as x approaches infinity. The participants clarify that the charge q2 must be expressed as a multiple of e, leading to confusion regarding the correct formulation of the final answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Understanding of electric charge units (e)
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
  • Concept of net force in a system of charged particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Coulomb's Law and its implications for multiple charges
  • Study the concept of electric field and force interactions between charged particles
  • Learn how to express charges in terms of elementary charge (e)
  • Explore common mistakes in electrostatic force calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to charged particle interactions and electric forces.

lydia_y620
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Figure (a) shows charged particles 1 and 2 that are fixed in place on an x axis. Particle 1 has a charge with a magnitude of |q1| = 19e. Particle 3 of charge q3 = +16e is initially on the x axis near particle 2.Then particle 3 is gradually moved in the positive direction of the x axis. As a result, the magnitude of the net electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particles 1 and 3 changes. Figure (b) gives the x component of that net force as a function of the position x of particle 3. The scale of the x axis is set by xs = 1.70 m. The plot has an asymptote of F2,net = 0.8688 × 10-25 N as x → ∞. As a multiple of e and including the sign, what is the charge q2 of particle 2?
upload_2017-1-31_1-36-40.png


Homework Equations


F = kq1q2/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


As x --> ∞, the force on particle 2 comes just from particle 1, so the force from particle 1 is always 0.8688 x 10^-25 N because particles 1 and 2 are stationary.
When x = 0.85 for particle 3, the net force on particle 2 is 0, so the force from particle 1 must equal the force from particle 3.
This means that 0.8688 x 10^-25 = k(q2*16e)/0.85^2
Is this correct? Apparently my answer is incorrect after I tried solving for q2 in terms of e.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-1-31_1-36-26.png
    upload_2017-1-31_1-36-26.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 1,104
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
lydia_y620 said:
1. Figure (a) shows charged particles 1 and 2 that are fixed in place on an x axis. Particle 1 has a charge with a magnitude of |q1| = 19e. Particle 3 of charge q3 = +16e is initially on the x axis near particle 2.Then particle 3 is gradually moved in the positive direction of the x axis. As a result, the magnitude of the net electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particles 1 and 3 changes. Figure (b) gives the x component of that net force as a function of the position x of particle 3. The scale of the x axis is set by xs = 1.70 m. The plot has an asymptote of F2,net = 0.8688 × 10-25 N as x → ∞. As a multiple of e and including the sign, what is the charge q2 of particle 2?
View attachment 112319

Homework Equations


F = kq1q2/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


As x --> ∞, the force on particle 2 comes just from particle 1, so the force from particle 1 is always 0.8688 x 10^-25 N because particles 1 and 2 are stationary.
When x = 0.85 for particle 3, the net force on particle 2 is 0, so the force from particle 1 must equal the force from particle 3.
This means that 0.8688 x 10^-25 = k(q2*16e)/0.85^2
Is this correct? Apparently my answer is incorrect after I tried solving for q2 in terms of e.[/B]
Please post your final answer.
I note that it asks for the charge as a multiple of e, but your last equation would naturally give a multiple of 1/e.
 
haruspex said:
Please post your final answer.
I note that it asks for the charge as a multiple of e, but your last equation would naturally give a multiple of 1/e.
My final answer was (4.359 x 10^-37)/e, which, like you've said, doesn't make sense because it's a multiple of 1/e.
 
lydia_y620 said:
My final answer was (4.359 x 10^-37)/e, which, like you've said, doesn't make sense because it's a multiple of 1/e.
It does make sense. It arises naturally from q1=Fr2/(kq2).
So express it as constant x e instead. e is a known value.
 
The checker is not taking it as that.
 
NSchool2000 said:
The checker is not taking it as that.
What checker is not taking what as what?
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K