Coulombs vs Amps: Understanding the Discrepancy in Charge Measurement

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Romperstomper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amps
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between coulombs and amps, specifically addressing the perceived discrepancy in charge measurement. Participants explore the definitions of current and charge, the implications of high current values, and the physiological effects of such currents. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and technical explanations related to electrical current and charge flow.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that a current of 10A indicates that 10C of charge is flowing through a wire, emphasizing that this charge is not stored but is in motion.
  • Others express concern about the safety of high currents, stating that while 10A may seem reasonable in some contexts, it can be dangerous from a physiological perspective.
  • A participant questions the definition of current and its relation to charge flow, suggesting that the confusion arises from interpreting current as charge stored rather than charge flowing.
  • Some contributions include calculations regarding the flow of electrons corresponding to a current of 10A, with participants seeking to understand if such rates are reasonable.
  • There are mentions of specific devices, such as air compressors and welders, that draw significant currents, which some participants use to illustrate practical examples of high current usage.
  • One participant references the current draw of CPUs, suggesting that high current values can be common in certain electronic devices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the interpretation of current and charge. While some clarify definitions and concepts, others raise concerns about safety and practical examples, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple viewpoints present.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include potential misunderstandings of current definitions, the physiological effects of current levels, and the assumptions about charge flow versus charge storage in conductors. These aspects contribute to the complexity of the discussion without reaching a consensus.

Romperstomper
A coulumb is a massive amount of charge, almost impossible to place a charge of 1C onto an object. Yet, a current of 10A, 10C/s is quite reasonable. Explain the discrepancy?

I know it has to do with the fact that current is measured as the net charge over time, but I can't fully explain it. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have misunderstood it a little bit. 10A currents means that 10 C of charge is flowing through the given part or wire, it means that 10 C charge is entering and leaving the wire at the same time. You can compare it to a pipe with water flowing in it. But you are taking it as 10 C current appears on the wire in 1 sec.
 
I'm curious: what do you mean by quite reasonable? In terms of physiological effects of currents, currents in milliamps can be quite harmful, and a 1 A current can be deadly. So from a human point of view, 10 A is not something you want to mess with. I haven't seen 10 A anywhere before, so I'm wondering if there is a specific device you saw that draws such a large current.

(10 C/s) * (1 e / 1.60 x 10-19 C) = 6.25 x 1019 e/s

Is that a reasonable rate of flow of electrons? Anyone?
 
cepheid said:
I haven't seen 10 A anywhere before, so I'm wondering if there is a specific device you saw that draws such a large current.

(10 C/s) * (1 e / 1.60 x 10-19 C) = 6.25 x 1019 e/s

Is that a reasonable rate of flow of electrons? Anyone?

Yes it is. It depends on the voltage applied. For example, an electric heater of 2 kW connected to a 230 V supply draws about 9 A. (The power is voltage times current.) Just look around in your flat and check the power (watts) of the light bulbs, computer, micro, tv, and so on.

ehild
 
aekanshchumber said:
You have misunderstood it a little bit. 10A currents means that 10 C of charge is flowing through the given part or wire, it means that 10 C charge is entering and leaving the wire at the same time. You can compare it to a pipe with water flowing in it. But you are taking it as 10 C current appears on the wire in 1 sec.


My book defines amps as C/S...or coulumbs per unit time...but the definition of current is given as the amount of charge flowing through a certain region, so I guess that's where my confusion is placed.

This is a discussion question in my book. What I'm thinking is that it's 10 C flowing through the wire, not 10C stored in it, and that's why it's reasonable. Is this right?
 
cepheid said:
I'm curious: what do you mean by quite reasonable? In terms of physiological effects of currents, currents in milliamps can be quite harmful, and a 1 A current can be deadly. So from a human point of view, 10 A is not something you want to mess with. I haven't seen 10 A anywhere before, so I'm wondering if there is a specific device you saw that draws such a large current.

(10 C/s) * (1 e / 1.60 x 10-19 C) = 6.25 x 1019 e/s

Is that a reasonable rate of flow of electrons? Anyone?

I have an air compressor and a small welder that require 15A. 15A is the max rating on most household outlets.
 
Ok cool^^. I just wanted to know.
 
Romperstomper said:
My book defines amps as C/S...or coulumbs per unit time...but the definition of current is given as the amount of charge flowing through a certain region, so I guess that's where my confusion is placed.

Current is the amount of charge flowing through the cross-section of the conductor in unit time. You can imagine that C/s in the following way. You charge a body, say, a big sphere through a wire that is connected to a source. The charge flows onto the sphere through the wire. The increment of the charge on the sphere in unit time equals the charge flowing through the wire during the same time, that is, the current.

This is a discussion question in my book. What I'm thinking is that it's 10 C flowing through the wire, not 10C stored in it, and that's why it's reasonable. Is this right?

This is right. There is no charge stored in the wire, it contains equal amount of positive and negative charges, positive metal ions and negative electrons which are the "charge carriers" in metals. The amount of both the positive and negative charge is quite high (try to estimate, how much is it in a piece of wire) but they cancel each other. The current is proportional to the density of the charge carriers N, their average "drift" velocity v, their charge q, and the cross section A. I=NqvA.

ehild
 
Many CPUs (the device which is at the heart of your computers) dissipate about 70W, running at about 2V. This means your computer CPU draws around 35A.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K