Coupled Harmonic oscillator problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the equations of motion for a system of two coupled harmonic oscillators, represented by masses m1 and m2 connected by springs with force constants k1, k2, and k3. The user correctly identifies the need to account for the third spring connecting the two masses, leading to the equations: m1 * \ddot{x} = k1 * x1 + k3 * (x2 - x1) and m2 * \ddot{x} = k2 * x2 + k3 * (x2 - x1). The user also notes potential issues with the signs in the equations, indicating a need for careful consideration of directionality in the setup.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically harmonic oscillators
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of spring constants and their role in oscillatory motion
  • Ability to set up and solve differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of coupled harmonic oscillator equations in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the effects of damping on harmonic oscillators
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations related to oscillatory systems
  • Investigate the stability analysis of coupled oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on mechanical systems, dynamics, and oscillatory motion analysis.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
I need your help to solve this problem on coupled harmonic oscillators.

Two masses m1 and m2 are attached to two rigid supports by means of springs of force constants k1 and k2 respectively. The masses are connected to a third spring of force constant k3. The masses are free to move along the x-axis, assuming there is no damping. Set up the equations of motion for the system.

My work:

I suppose the third spring is connected in between the two masses.
Equation for first mass is:
[tex]m_1\ddot{x} = -k_1x[/tex]
Equation for second mass is:
[tex]m_2\ddot{x} = -k_2x[/tex]

Now please help me proceed to setup the equation for the 2 connected masses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what you did didnt seem to cosnider the third spring
let it be in this order
k1 m1 k3 m2 k2 (thats how the steup would be, I am too lazy to draw a diagram)
suppose m1 was moved right or left) by some amount x1 then m2 may also move some amount x2 right?
i don't think it is necessary for x1 = x2.
so your equation is now (if i took the left direction to be positive)
[tex]m \ddot{x} = k_{1}x_{1} + k_{3}(x_{2}-x_{1})[/tex]
[tex]m \ddot{x} = k_{2}x_{2} + k_{3}(x_{2}-x_{1})[/tex]

thats my two cents
i think they may be a problem with the signs...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K