Coupled Vertical Spring-Mass Systems

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the coupled vertical spring-mass system equations for two masses, m1 and m2, under gravitational force and spring tension. The static equilibrium equations are established, leading to the dynamic equations of motion when the masses are displaced from equilibrium. The participants suggest that one approach to solve the system is to derive a single fourth-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) by expressing one variable in terms of the other. The expansion of the dynamic equation reveals that certain terms cancel out, simplifying the analysis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the principles of dynamics and equilibrium in solving the system.
graviton_10
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A vertical spring mass system is attached in series with another vertical spring mass system. Masses of both objects are different and so are the spring constants of both springs. y1 and y2 are the coordinates measured from the rest position of mass 1 and mass 2 respectively.

I have identified the forces on both masses using free body diagram, but I do not know how to proceed next.
My final goal is to set up matrix equation and then solve for normal frequencies.
Relevant Equations
Mq'' = Kq
How should I proceed?
112.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm getting ##\downarrow^+##:

$$m_1 \ddot y_1 = m_1 g - k_1( y_1 - l_1) + k_2 \Big[ (l_2 + y_2) - (l_1 + y_1) \Big]$$

$$m_2 \ddot y_2 = m_2 g - k_2 \Big[ (l_2 + y_2) - (l_1 + y_1) \Big]$$
 
As for solving the system, another option is to solve a single fourth order ODE by either solving ##y_1## in terms of ##y_2## and computing ##\ddot y_1## or visa-versa.
 
Actually, I blundered too.

1670942861162.png


Let ##l_1## and ##l_2## be the unloaded free lengths of the springs. The equation for static equilibrium ( LHS of the diagram)

$$ m_1 g - k_1( y_1 - l_1) + k_2( y_2 - l_2) = 0 \tag{1} $$

$$ m_2 g - k_2( y_2 - l_2 ) = 0 \tag{2}$$

Now, displace ##m_1, m_2## from equilibrium by some distance ## \Delta y_1, \Delta y_2## respectively. What follows is that:

$$ m_1 \ddot{\Delta y_1} = m_1 g - k_1( y_1 + \Delta y_1 - l_1 )+ k_2( y_2 + \Delta y_2 - \Delta y_1 - l_2) \tag{3}$$

Now, expand (3) as follows:

$$ m_1 \ddot{\Delta y_1} = \cancel{ \boxed{m_1 g - k_1( y_1 - l_1) + k_2( y_ 2 - l_2)}}^0 -k_1 \Delta y_1 + k_2( \Delta y_2 - \Delta y_1)$$

Notice the boxed terms are identically 0 by (1). It follows that:

$$ m_1 \ddot{\Delta y_1} = -k_1 \Delta y_1 + k_2( \Delta y_2 - \Delta y_1) \tag{4}$$

I'll let you determine the result for ##m_2##.
 
Last edited:
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...