Coupled Vertical Spring-Mass Systems

graviton_10
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A vertical spring mass system is attached in series with another vertical spring mass system. Masses of both objects are different and so are the spring constants of both springs. y1 and y2 are the coordinates measured from the rest position of mass 1 and mass 2 respectively.

I have identified the forces on both masses using free body diagram, but I do not know how to proceed next.
My final goal is to set up matrix equation and then solve for normal frequencies.
Relevant Equations
Mq'' = Kq
How should I proceed?
112.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm getting ##\downarrow^+##:

$$m_1 \ddot y_1 = m_1 g - k_1( y_1 - l_1) + k_2 \Big[ (l_2 + y_2) - (l_1 + y_1) \Big]$$

$$m_2 \ddot y_2 = m_2 g - k_2 \Big[ (l_2 + y_2) - (l_1 + y_1) \Big]$$
 
As for solving the system, another option is to solve a single fourth order ODE by either solving ##y_1## in terms of ##y_2## and computing ##\ddot y_1## or visa-versa.
 
Actually, I blundered too.

1670942861162.png


Let ##l_1## and ##l_2## be the unloaded free lengths of the springs. The equation for static equilibrium ( LHS of the diagram)

$$ m_1 g - k_1( y_1 - l_1) + k_2( y_2 - l_2) = 0 \tag{1} $$

$$ m_2 g - k_2( y_2 - l_2 ) = 0 \tag{2}$$

Now, displace ##m_1, m_2## from equilibrium by some distance ## \Delta y_1, \Delta y_2## respectively. What follows is that:

$$ m_1 \ddot{\Delta y_1} = m_1 g - k_1( y_1 + \Delta y_1 - l_1 )+ k_2( y_2 + \Delta y_2 - \Delta y_1 - l_2) \tag{3}$$

Now, expand (3) as follows:

$$ m_1 \ddot{\Delta y_1} = \cancel{ \boxed{m_1 g - k_1( y_1 - l_1) + k_2( y_ 2 - l_2)}}^0 -k_1 \Delta y_1 + k_2( \Delta y_2 - \Delta y_1)$$

Notice the boxed terms are identically 0 by (1). It follows that:

$$ m_1 \ddot{\Delta y_1} = -k_1 \Delta y_1 + k_2( \Delta y_2 - \Delta y_1) \tag{4}$$

I'll let you determine the result for ##m_2##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top