Covariant derivative transformation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transformation of covariant derivatives, specifically proving the transformation rule for the Christoffel symbols, denoted as \(\Gamma'^a_{bc}\). The formula presented is \(\Gamma'^a_{bc} = \frac{{\partial}x'^a}{{\partial}x^d} \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x'^b} \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x'^c} \Gamma^d_{ef} - \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x'^b} \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x'^c} \frac{{\partial}^2x'^a}{{\partial}x^f \partial x^d}\). Participants clarified that the variables used in the derivatives are dummy variables, which do not affect the outcome of the transformation. This understanding resolved the confusion regarding the notation in the transformation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant differentiation and tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with Christoffel symbols and their role in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in multivariable calculus
  • Proficiency in using partial derivatives and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the covariant derivative in various coordinate systems
  • Explore the implications of the transformation properties of tensors in differential geometry
  • Learn about the applications of Christoffel symbols in general relativity
  • Investigate the role of dummy variables in mathematical proofs and transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those focusing on differential geometry, general relativity, and tensor analysis.

faklif
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem concerns how to transform a covariant differentiation. Using this formula for covariant differentiation and demanding that it is a (1,1) tensor:
<br /> \nabla_cX^a=\partial_cX^a+\Gamma^a_{bc}X^b<br />
it should be proven that
<br /> \Gamma&#039;^a_{bc}=<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}<br /> -<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x^e}}<br />

Homework Equations


<br /> \partial&#039;_cX&#039;^a=<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}\frac{\partial}{{\partial}x^f}<br /> (<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}X^d<br /> )=<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{\partial}{{\partial}x^f}<br /> X^d<br /> +<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^f{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> X^d<br />

<br /> X^d<br /> =<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^b}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> X^d<br /> =<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> X&#039;^b<br />
<br /> X^e<br /> =<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> X&#039;^b<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I'd simply look at the primed coordinates from two directions and that that should do it... didn't quite happen as planned though.

In primed coordinates
<br /> \nabla_cX^a&#039;<br /> =<br /> {\partial}&#039;_cX&#039;^a<br /> +<br /> \Gamma^a_{bc}&#039;X&#039;^b<br />

Transformed using the equations under 2.
<br /> \nabla_cX^a&#039;<br /> =<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{\partial}{{\partial}x^f}<br /> X^d<br /> +<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}X^e<br /> =<br /> {\partial}&#039;_cX&#039;^a<br /> -<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^f{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> X^d<br /> +<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}X^e<br /> =<br /> {\partial}&#039;_cX&#039;^a<br /> -<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^f{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> X&#039;^b<br /> +<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> X&#039;^b<br />

So my thought was that anything related to X'^b would be the what I seek which gives

<br /> \Gamma&#039;^a_{bc}=<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}<br /> -<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^f{\partial}x^d}<br />

This i kind of close but it's different in the last part where I have f:s instead of e:s. I would really appreciate some help, I've been stuck for a long time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
faklif said:
Using this formula for covariant differentiation and demanding that it is a (1,1) tensor:
<br /> \nabla_cX^a=\partial_cX^a+\Gamma^a_{bc}X^b<br />
it should be proven that
<br /> \Gamma&#039;^a_{bc}=<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}<br /> -<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x^e}}<br />

<br /> \Gamma&#039;^a_{bc}=<br /> \frac{{\partial}x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^d}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^e}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \Gamma^d_{ef}<br /> -<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^d}{{\partial}x&#039;^b}<br /> \frac{{\partial}x^f}{{\partial}x&#039;^c}<br /> \frac{{\partial}^2x&#039;^a}{{\partial}x^f{\partial}x^d}<br />

This i kind of close but it's different in the last part where I have f:s instead of e:s. I would really appreciate some help, I've been stuck for a long time.

Hi faklif! :smile:

Do you mean you're worried about having ∂xf and /∂xf instead of ∂xe and /∂xe ?

They're "dummy variables" … it doesn't matter what they are! :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi faklif! :smile:

Do you mean you're worried about having ∂xf and /∂xf instead of ∂xe and /∂xe ?

They're "dummy variables" … it doesn't matter what they are! :wink:

Hi and thank you!

Now that I think some more about it (should have done that before spending the better part of the weekend :wink:, having to much spare time makes me stupid...) it makes sense. For a given a,b,c you'd still get the same implied summations. Thanks again for rescuing my monday!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K