Covariant divergence of vector; physical meaning with contracted Tuv

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tertius
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the covariant divergence of a vector, specifically defined as $$\nabla_\mu V^\mu = \partial_\mu V^\mu + \Gamma^\mu_{\mu\lambda}V^\lambda$$. By substituting the Christoffel symbol, the expression simplifies to $$\nabla_\mu V^\mu = \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_\mu(\sqrt{g}V^\mu)$$. The rank-1 tensor $$U_\nu T^{\mu\nu}$$ represents energy and momentum densities, and its covariant divergence accounts for changes in these densities across coordinate directions. The interpretation emphasizes that this divergence is independent of volumetric changes, particularly in the context of a flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant derivatives in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with the Christoffel symbols and their role in general relativity
  • Knowledge of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric
  • Basic concepts of tensor calculus and rank-1 tensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the covariant derivative in general relativity
  • Explore the significance of the Christoffel symbols in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the implications of energy-momentum tensors in cosmological models
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of the determinant of the metric tensor
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and cosmology, will benefit from this discussion.

Tertius
Messages
57
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
The covariant divergence of a vector has a simplified form. I am discussing this in relation to a contraction of the SEM tensor and its meaning.
I'm studying Carroll's section on covariant derivatives, which shows that the covariant divergence of a vector ##V^\mu## is given by $$\nabla_\mu V^\mu = \partial_\mu V^\mu + \Gamma^\mu_{\mu\lambda}V^\lambda$$. Because ##\Gamma^\mu_{\mu\lambda}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_\lambda \sqrt{g}## we can write $$\nabla_\mu V^\mu = \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_\mu(\sqrt{g}V^\mu)$$. If we say ##V^\mu = U_\nu T^{\mu\nu}##, then the covariant divergence looks like $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_\mu(\sqrt{g} U_\nu T^{\mu\nu})$$. The rank-1 tensor ##U_\nu T^{\mu\nu}## should represent the energy and momentum densities in each of the 4 coordinate directions. The covariant divergence of this rank-1 tensor should then be the sum of the changes of the energy and momentum densities along each coordinate. The simplified form $$\nabla_\mu V^\mu = \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_\mu(\sqrt{g}V^\mu)$$ looks to be volume independent in that the partial derivative is taken of the volume element multiplied by the vector, and then divided again by ##\sqrt{g}## after the change is computed. From this perspective, it seems like ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \partial_\mu(\sqrt{g}V^\mu)## should represent changes to the components of ##V^\mu## independent of volumetric changes. Is this a correct interpretation?
For a flat FRW universe of only dust and a timelike observer, it would look like $$\frac{1}{a^3}\partial_t(-\rho a^3)$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
I realized the problem was quite simple. The covariant derivative is "correcting" for changes to the metric. The changes in the FRW metric look volumetric because ##\sqrt{g}=a^3##.
 
It's, of course, ##\sqrt{-g}## everywhere, since ##g=\mathrm{det} g<0##. Otherwise it's correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tertius

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
940
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K