Jarvis323
- 1,247
- 988
I cited that paper. It's an accepted Nature paper, but it turned out to be controversial. There has been a lot of criticism of it on reddit and twitter as far as I could tell. I don't know what to make of it at this point.atyy said:Earlier in the thread a paper was mentioned that made some comparison with HIV, but I think the resemblence is superficial since SARS-CoV-2 doesn't seem to replicate in the immune cells.
The news article that reported it also made a lot of claims based on anonymous sources.
I guess I shouldn't have been so quick to post it.
Side rant: This crisis is a major awakening for many people to the scientific research process. News articles typically treat hearsay as fact, let alone un-peer reviewed publications. It may come as a shock also to many that even accepted peer reviewed papers could have flaws, or even have false conclusions without technical flaws, and that even mainstream theories (e.g. big bang) are not matters of fact.
Even most Journalists claiming to be fact checking and combating misinformation are blatantly doing the opposite (likely without even realizing it).
Lack of critical thinking skills is showing to be a major world crisis, that is negatively affecting all areas from research, to public policy and action, politics, and public belief/opinion. I mean, I'm no exception. We just really need to do a better job in the future teaching people how to think critically.
In my opinion, current culture and systems thrive/operate way too much based on manipulation, and incentivize dumbing down, and mis/under-informing the general population. I think this will lead our species and planet to ruin in the long run if we aren't careful.
Last edited: