Suggestion Create a Mentor Advisory Tag for Easy Guidance and Cautionary Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter sylas
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A proposal has been made for a special "Mentor advisory" tag to enhance guidance and cautionary advice from mentors within forum discussions. This tag would visually distinguish mentor advice by placing it in a bordered box with a different background color, making it more noticeable. The suggestion includes automatic time-stamping for these advisories and emphasizes that only mentors should utilize this tag, potentially enforced through software or community correction. The aim is to clarify mentor actions and provide context without necessitating immediate edits to posts. This initiative seeks to improve communication and guidance within the forum community.
sylas
Science Advisor
Messages
1,647
Reaction score
9
I think it would be really useful to have a special tag made available for use by mentors only when giving advice in their capacity as mentors. The effect of the tag should be to put the text in a new box, indented left and right, with a border and a slightly different color background.

Using the "code" tag to give an approximation, it would would look a bit like this, but with a normal font and with "Mentor advisory notice" instead of "Code" as the label. It might be handy to let such notices be given a time of entry automatically as well.
Code:
Mentor advisory...

It would be expected that only mentors should use the tag. That could be enforced by software, or if that is too hard then simply by mentors correcting any improper usage by others.

Advisories could be easily added into an existing post, requesting (for example) no followup on an off topic remark, or advising of a deletion, or advising of a thread move, or anything else.

I think this could really help make more clear some of the guidance being supplied, and in some cases could work as an alternative to making edits of someone's post; just to give a caution or advice for future reference if the problem is sufficiently minor to mean an immediate edit is not necessary.

I'm basing this suggestion on remarks I made in [post=2486680]msg #2[/post] of the thread "Why can posts be deleted from threads at the will of a single Moderator?" I think it is worth its own suggestion thread.

Cheers -- sylas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think for the most part I've seen mentor's explain their 'mentoring' actions sufficiently when they have been used. I guess inhabiting the cosmo part of the forum means I don't see some of the more controversial threads, but from my experience in the cosmo/astro forum, mentors do a good job of explaining why certain action were taken, and it's clear when they have the 'mentor' hat on as opposed to when they are simply participating in the discussion in the same way as anyone else.

It might be different elsewhere though.
 
When I've had to interject in a thread, I have prefaced it with "Moderator's note:" or something to that effect.
 
Redbelly98 said:
When I've had to interject in a thread, I have prefaced it with "Moderator's note:" or something to that effect.

That works. I just thought it might help to let them stand out a bit better. Sometimes a note like that gets missed. If it is a lot of work then it probably isn't worth it. I don't actually know the details of your software, but I suspect it would be pretty easy; in which case it could be useful.

Cheers -- sylas
 
Greg and chroot, as Administrators, would be familiar with the software. Mentors, as a rule, do not have that level of access.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Greg and chroot, as Administrators, would be familiar with the software. Mentors, as a rule, do not have that level of access.

Of course. I was thinking of it as a tool mentors and users might find useful, and which Greg might or chroot might consider implementing, if it was easy to do and if mentors thought it might help.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top