Creating a Working Newton Cradle: Physics & Glass/Stone Balls

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Craig113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Newton Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges of creating a working Newton cradle using glass or stone balls, which exhibit reduced velocity and increased movement after collisions. Participants identify that the inelastic nature of collisions, along with potential differences in ball mass and material elasticity, affects the cradle's performance. The consensus indicates that metal balls, known for their higher elasticity, would likely yield better results. Friction is acknowledged as a factor in slowing movement but is not seen as the primary cause of the observed issues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy concepts
  • Basic physics of materials and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of elastic materials and their impact on collision dynamics
  • Explore the design and construction of Newton cradles using different materials
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution on collision outcomes
  • Learn about energy loss mechanisms in inelastic collisions
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, hobbyists building Newton cradles, and educators seeking to demonstrate principles of motion and energy transfer.

Craig113
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
have been trying to make me own workig Newton cradle. I know some physics. the problem is that my balls don´ta completely stop moving after the coalition, they rather continua their movement but with a reduced violocity. This typ of movement increases and grows with the number of coalitions. At the end all of the balls move with eatch other. And that's not what i want. The balls i have been using are glas or stone balls. I could not get my hands on metal balls. Can that be the reason for this failure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction at the point where you attached the ball's to the support and loss of energy in inelastic collisions. Metal balls are much more elastic than glass or stone.
 
Thanks for replaying. I don't think friction is the answer to why the movement of the balls are not the way they are supposed to be. Friction can only explain why do movement slows down and gradually ends. The collision is inelastic, that means that the kinestic energy turns into heat but how can this effect the type av movment?
 
It could be that your balls don't have equal masss.
 
Craig113 said:
The collision is inelastic, that means that the kinestic energy turns into heat but how can this effect the type av movment?

What if the first collision were totally inelastic? This would be the case if the balls were made of something that deformed without springing back, like clay. Don't you think that would "effect the type av movement"?
 
Still, it does not make sense. Stone balls should be elastic enought to get the desired type of movement. I mean, what type of balls did Netwons himself use? Did he not use stone balls? I think he did.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K