Creative solution to a physics problem

Main Question or Discussion Point

This was posted on digg and I don't remember seeing it on here, so i thought I'd share:

http://www.robmonroe.net/upload/2007/1/24/elephantintheway.jpg [Broken]

:rofl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

391
2
"Does the object continue to move after it comes to a rest?"


.........:rofl:
 
Kurdt
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,769
6
"Does the object continue to move after it comes to a rest?"


.........:rofl:
Indeed the question is almost as dumb as the answer.
 
2,903
13
Why?


texttttt
 
352
1
I love it.
 
Kurdt
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,769
6
I'm surprised they'd give five points for the second part of that question. It's obvious by inspection. You read the word "frictionless", and the question answers itself.
 
2,903
13
It could have been worded better do you not think?
Whats wrong with the wording?
 
Whats wrong with the wording?
Think like a normal person (i.e., one who does not recognize that it only comes to rest for an instant of time). Something that has come to rest has ceased moving. By definition, it will not be moving after it has come to rest.

Interesting aside: the quickest way to reconcile the two perspectives is to point out there is no "after" associated with the rest in question. The time spent at rest is zero.
 
2,903
13
The question is written the way it is to see who knows the material. If the question said, comes to a rest instantaneously, I think it would be obvious to everyone that its going to move again.
 
Kurdt
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,769
6
Whats wrong with the wording?
Would you expect five marks for answering no? Evidentally the person who completed the question thought this could be remedied :rofl:
 
2,903
13
If you put no, you would get a zero. Elephants or not.
 
2,903
13
Consider this, does this system ever come to a complete rest?

No, it does not. So there can ONLY be one solution implied in the question the way it is written.
 
389
0
LOL.

Qns : What would happen if you connected several light bulbs in a series?

Ans : Nothing, you didn't connect it to a battery.
 
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
110
80
Think like a normal person (i.e., one who does not recognize that it only comes to rest for an instant of time). Something that has come to rest has ceased moving. By definition, it will not be moving after it has come to rest.

Interesting aside: the quickest way to reconcile the two perspectives is to point out there is no "after" associated with the rest in question. The time spent at rest is zero.
Even old folks in a bank know that:

Now, what's it gonna be young feller? You want I should freeze or get down on the ground? 'Cause if'n I freeze, I can't rightly drop. And if'n I drop, I'm gonna be in motion.
 

Related Threads for: Creative solution to a physics problem

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
342
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
Top