Creative solution to a physics problem (1 Viewer)

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

This was posted on digg and I don't remember seeing it on here, so i thought I'd share:

http://www.robmonroe.net/upload/2007/1/24/elephantintheway.jpg [Broken]

:rofl:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Does the object continue to move after it comes to a rest?"


.........:rofl:
 

Kurdt

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,743
6
"Does the object continue to move after it comes to a rest?"


.........:rofl:
Indeed the question is almost as dumb as the answer.
 
2,788
13
Why?


texttttt
 
345
1
I love it.
 
I'm surprised they'd give five points for the second part of that question. It's obvious by inspection. You read the word "frictionless", and the question answers itself.
 
Whats wrong with the wording?
Think like a normal person (i.e., one who does not recognize that it only comes to rest for an instant of time). Something that has come to rest has ceased moving. By definition, it will not be moving after it has come to rest.

Interesting aside: the quickest way to reconcile the two perspectives is to point out there is no "after" associated with the rest in question. The time spent at rest is zero.
 
2,788
13
The question is written the way it is to see who knows the material. If the question said, comes to a rest instantaneously, I think it would be obvious to everyone that its going to move again.
 

Kurdt

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,743
6
Whats wrong with the wording?
Would you expect five marks for answering no? Evidentally the person who completed the question thought this could be remedied :rofl:
 
2,788
13
If you put no, you would get a zero. Elephants or not.
 
2,788
13
Consider this, does this system ever come to a complete rest?

No, it does not. So there can ONLY be one solution implied in the question the way it is written.
 
389
0
LOL.

Qns : What would happen if you connected several light bulbs in a series?

Ans : Nothing, you didn't connect it to a battery.
 

BobG

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1
80
Think like a normal person (i.e., one who does not recognize that it only comes to rest for an instant of time). Something that has come to rest has ceased moving. By definition, it will not be moving after it has come to rest.

Interesting aside: the quickest way to reconcile the two perspectives is to point out there is no "after" associated with the rest in question. The time spent at rest is zero.
Even old folks in a bank know that:

Now, what's it gonna be young feller? You want I should freeze or get down on the ground? 'Cause if'n I freeze, I can't rightly drop. And if'n I drop, I'm gonna be in motion.
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top