Creep Testing Help - Secondary creep rate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding secondary creep rates in materials, specifically lead, through experimental data and mathematical modeling. Participants explore the relationship between stress, creep rate, and activation energy, while also discussing how to graph and analyze their results from creep testing experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their confusion regarding the use of a formula for secondary creep rate, E, which involves constants A and n, and the activation energy Qc.
  • Another participant suggests plotting extension against time to find the secondary creep rate and emphasizes the importance of understanding the exponential relationship between creep rate and stress.
  • There is a discussion about taking natural logs of the equation to simplify the relationship, but uncertainty remains about how to determine the constants A and Qc.
  • Participants discuss the implications of taking the logarithm of the equation, noting that the slope on a log-log chart can provide insights into the stress exponent without needing to know all constants.
  • A new participant seeks help in calculating creep rates based on known stress and creep rate values, indicating a need for clarification on the methodology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the application of the creep rate formula and the significance of constants A and Qc. While some find clarity in the logarithmic approach, others still struggle with the concepts, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple viewpoints on how to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on how to utilize the constants A and Qc in their calculations, and there are unresolved questions regarding the methodology for estimating creep rates from given data.

DdotT
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I tested creep in the labs at univeristy, one thing i am confused about is, we made a graph of the extension against time. Taking the gradient gives us E or secondary creep rate.

Homework Statement




The equation for this (without using gradient ) is, E= A stress^n e^-Qc/RT

A and n are constants ( i know n is the stress exponent which for the material (lead) was 10)

Qc is the activation energy, can't find anything about this.

R is universal gas constant 8.31 J/mol K

Note: the test was done at room temperature.

T is absolute temp.



Really confused by this, the experiment helper didn't explain any of this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DdotT said:
I tested creep in the labs at univeristy, one thing i am confused about is, we made a graph of the extension against time. Taking the gradient gives us E or secondary creep rate.

Homework Statement




The equation for this (without using gradient ) is, E= A stress^n e^-Qc/RT

A and n are constants ( i know n is the stress exponent which for the material (lead) was 10)

Qc is the activation energy, can't find anything about this.

R is universal gas constant 8.31 J/mol K

Note: the test was done at room temperature.

T is absolute temp.



Really confused by this, the experiment helper didn't explain any of this.

Hi DdotT, welcome to PF! What are you trying to do? Is the problem to estimate one of the parameters?
 
Mapes said:
Hi DdotT, welcome to PF! What are you trying to do? Is the problem to estimate one of the parameters?

No the 'thing' i need to do is draw up curves for the 3 specimens (extension against time), work out the stress , work out the secondary creep rate, then take natural logs of these, then plot a final graph with the natural logs, take the gradient of the line of best fit, that gives me the stress exponent (10 in lead's case).
However, this is what the experiment helper told us to do, in our booklets are the formula i stated, i do not understand how i would use this formula / get the secondary creep rate ε without taking the gradient.
 
OK, got it. You should first plot extension vs. time. Secondary creep occurs after an initial transient and before rapid failure; it is a region of relatively constant creep rate. Find this creep rate. This will be E in your equation above. Note that it depends exponentially on stress. So plot the stress vs. creep rate on a log-log scale; the slope of the line is an estimate of the exponent. Does this make sense?
 
Mapes said:
OK, got it. You should first plot extension vs. time. Secondary creep occurs after an initial transient and before rapid failure; it is a region of relatively constant creep rate. Find this creep rate. This will be E in your equation above. Note that it depends exponentially on stress. So plot the stress vs. creep rate on a log-log scale; the slope of the line is an estimate of the exponent. Does this make sense?

yh i understand this, and its relation to the exponent.
its the equation of: ε = A σ^n e^ Qc / RT

E is the secondary creep rate , stress is σ, n is the stress exponent of lead which is 10, Qc os the 'activation energy' for creep in the metal, R universal gas constant and T is temp.

How do i use this equation ?

i have stress, n , R, T (room temp i think).
I do not know Qc or A. It says A and n are constants.
So i really don't understand how to use this.

Sorry if i didnt make it clear what i needed help with.
 
DdotT said:
yh i understand this, and its relation to the exponent.
its the equation of: ε = A σ^n e^ Qc / RT

E is the secondary creep rate , stress is σ, n is the stress exponent of lead which is 10, Qc os the 'activation energy' for creep in the metal, R universal gas constant and T is temp.

How do i use this equation ?

i have stress, n , R, T (room temp i think).
I do not know Qc or A. It says A and n are constants.
So i really don't understand how to use this.

Sorry if i didnt make it clear what i needed help with.

You know that ε = E here, right? Just checking.
 
Mapes said:
You know that ε = E here, right? Just checking.

yes, i just don't know what to subsitute for things like A and Qc
 
DdotT said:
yes, i just don't know what to subsitute for things like A and Qc

Does it matter? What happens when you take the log of ε = A σ^n e^ Qc / RT?
 
Mapes said:
Does it matter? What happens when you take the log of ε = A σ^n e^ Qc / RT?

lnε = ln A + nlnσ - Qc / RT

but we still need to know Qc and constant A? i just don't understand it x( sorry
 
  • #10
DdotT said:
lnε = ln A + nlnσ - Qc / RT

but we still need to know Qc and constant A? i just don't understand it x( sorry

When one considers dlnε/dlnσ = n (i.e., the slope of ε vs. σ on a log-log chart), all other parameters go away. Know what I mean?
 
  • #11
Mapes said:
When one considers dlnε/dlnσ = n (i.e., the slope of ε vs. σ on a log-log chart), all other parameters go away. Know what I mean?

yes, it makes more sense know. thank you.
 
  • #12
Hi
I am new to it. Still don't understand. Can you help with this:
I have known: 1 stess and 1 creep rate; 2 stress and 2 creep rate; 3 stress and need to calculate 3 creep rate based on the above.
The temperature is constant. the same all the time.
s1; e1
s2; e2
s3; ?
What is the easiest way to do it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
22K