aaaa202
- 1,144
- 2
I also don't agree with the transfer from (29-26) to (29-27). Either there is something very wrong with the statement or there is something going on backstage that we are not shown.aaaa202 said:If I take the logarithm of the expansion in eq. (29-26) I don't get what is stated below. What should I do to get that?