Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a new random variable defined in terms of an existing random variable's distribution function. Participants explore the implications of transforming a random variable using its CDF, specifically focusing on the case where the original distribution function is strictly monotonic.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant presents a problem involving the transformation of a random variable $Y=F_X(X)$, where $F_X(x)$ is the CDF of a strictly monotonic random variable $X.
- Another participant questions the notation used, clarifying that $F_X(x)$ represents a number for a given $x$, and suggests that the correct expression should be $Y=F_X(X)$, indicating a function of the random variable $X$.
- A later reply confirms the correction to $Y=F_X(X)$ and inquires whether this represents a transformation.
- One participant notes that since $F_X$ is strictly monotonic, it possesses an inverse $F_X^{-1}$ and begins to derive the CDF of $Y$ based on this property, but seeks further simplification of the expression.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the correction of the notation from $Y=F_X(x)$ to $Y=F_X(X)$. However, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the simplification of the derived expression for the CDF of $Y$.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the properties of the random variable $X$ and the implications of the transformation on the distribution of $Y$. The steps for deriving the CDF of $Y$ are not fully resolved.