Curvature effect can be neglected

  • Thread starter Thread starter werson tan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which the curvature effect can be neglected in fluid mechanics, particularly when the ratio of length to radius (ℓ/R) is much less than one. Participants are exploring the implications of this approximation in various contexts, including projectile motion and fluid flow between cylinders.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of neglecting curvature, with some suggesting analogies to projectile motion and the Earth's curvature. Others discuss the mathematical implications of the ℓ/R ratio and its significance in determining the effects of curvature on fluid velocity profiles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking further clarification on the concepts presented. Some have offered insights into the relationship between curvature and fluid dynamics, while others express confusion and request additional explanations or analogies.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the limits of approximation in fluid mechanics, particularly regarding the conditions under which curvature can be considered negligible. Participants are also grappling with the implications of specific ratios and the nature of the systems being analyzed.

werson tan
Messages
183
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



why when ℓ / R ≪ 1 , the curvature effect can be neglected ??

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


no matter how small or how big is R , it is strill considered as curvature , right ??
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20160224_093352[1].jpg
    IMG_20160224_093352[1].jpg
    33.3 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
It would take a bit of analysis to demonstrate clearly that the curvature can be neglected, but it is not unusual that this should be the case. When solving a question for the range of an arrow, do you take the curvature of the Earth into account?
 
haruspex said:
It would take a bit of analysis to demonstrate clearly that the curvature can be neglected, but it is not unusual that this should be the case. When solving a question for the range of an arrow, do you take the curvature of the Earth into account?
can you explain in detail by giving analogy (is arrow represent ℓ ) ?
 
werson tan said:
can you explain in detail by giving analogy (is arrow represent ℓ ) ?
When you solve a problem involving projectile motion, do you take the curvature of the Earth into account?
 
If you solve the fluid mechanics problem you are talking about exactly for the velocity distribution, and then take the limit of the solution as l/R approaches zero, you will find that the solution approaches that for shear flow between to infinite parallel plates. So, as l/r approaches, the curvature of the system can be neglected.
 
Chestermiller said:
If you solve the fluid mechanics problem you are talking about exactly for the velocity distribution, and then take the limit of the solution as l/R approaches zero, you will find that the solution approaches that for shear flow between to infinite parallel plates. So, as l/r approaches, the curvature of the system can be neglected.
what do you mean ? can you explain further?
 
Chestermiller said:
If you solve the fluid mechanics problem you are talking about exactly for the velocity distribution, and then take the limit of the solution as l/R approaches zero, you will find that the solution approaches that for shear flow between to infinite parallel plates. So, as l/r approaches, the curvature of the system can be neglected.
when R is big relative to l , we can only say that the two circle 'combined together' , right ? how can the curvature be neglected?
 
werson tan said:
what do you mean ? can you explain further?
What they are saying is that if l/R is very small, the velocity profile for that flow approaches that for shear flow between two parallel plates. Basically, the system behaves as if the curvature is negligible. It isn't R and it isn't l individually that determines the effect of curvature in this system. It is the dimensionless group l/R. Imagine that the inner diameter is 1 mile, and the outer diameter is 1 mile plus 0.1 inch. On the local scale of the gap between the cylinders, you couldn't tell whether the system is curved, or whether you are dealing with two parallel plates.
 
werson tan said:
when R is big relative to l , we can only say that the two circle 'combined together' , right ? how can the curvature be neglected?
It isn't that the curvature is not there. It is that the effect of the curvature on the fluid velocity profile in the gap between the cylinders is negligible.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
What they are saying is that if l/R is very small, the velocity profile for that flow approaches that for shear flow between two parallel plates. Basically, the system behaves as if the curvature is negligible. It isn't R and it isn't l individually that determines the effect of curvature in this system. It is the dimensionless group l/R. Imagine that the inner diameter is 1 mile, and the outer diameter is 1 mile plus 0.1 inch. On the local scale of the gap between the cylinders, you couldn't tell whether the system is curved, or whether you are dealing with two parallel plates.

why ? i still can't understand
 
  • #11
werson tan said:
why ? i still can't understand
I don't know how to explain it any better. As I said, if you solved for the velocity profile between the two cylinders exactly and took the limit as the gap between the cylinders became very small (compared to the radii). you would approach the same velocity profile as that for flow between infinite parallel plates. In fluid mechanics, you need to be able to recognize the kinds of approximations you can make for specific situations. Otherwise, you will be wasting your valuable time spending hours to solve a problem that you could have done in minutes. I guess you are asking why it is that you are not able to recognize the simplifying approximation that can be made in this problem. I don't know how to answer that because it seems so obvious to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K