Curved motion, r(φ) when r is accelerating

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kamil.borkowski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an equation for r(t) to describe the motion of a blue dot in a curved trajectory, particularly in the context of a spring-powered target thrower. Participants explore the implications of acceleration on the motion and the necessary conditions to derive a suitable mathematical model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using φ=εt²/2 for angular displacement but is uncertain about how to express r(t) given the acceleration.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for a complete set of requirements for r(t) and questions whether forces are involved in the problem.
  • A participant describes the motion of a clay target and mentions the importance of knowing the velocity when the target leaves the arm, which is 27 m/s, while noting that other factors complicate the calculations.
  • It is pointed out that the instantaneous velocity in polar coordinates must account for both radial and tangential components, and a physically reasonable formula for r(t) is necessary.
  • Concerns are raised about determining motion without considering forces, as many possible trajectories could result in the same final speed of 27 m/s.
  • A suggestion is made to also consider the time needed to reach the speed from rest to calculate the angular acceleration of the thrower and to use the rotating reference frame for computing r(t).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of incorporating forces into the problem and the conditions required to derive r(t). The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the problem due to the involvement of forces, the need for specific parameters, and the assumptions regarding initial conditions and acceleration. These factors contribute to the uncertainty in deriving a definitive equation for r(t).

kamil.borkowski
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

I have a problem to find an equation of r(t), which will help me to describe motion of blue dot. I have seen many cases where there is a linear motion and you can write φ=ωt , r=V0t, but here there is an acceleration. I think I can write φ=εt2/2, but what about r(t) ? I have tried differencial equation
r = at2/2 + r0 → r = (r''-rφ')t2/2 + r0, but not sure if it's right. I need all this to have equation of path r(φ). r0 is initial position of blue dot, where V0=0 and ω=0. Cheers!

9iqvmd.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kamil.borkowski said:
Hi there!

I have a problem to find an equation of r(t), which will help me to describe motion of blue dot.

There are many possible formulas for r(t) that would produce a curved trajectory. To pose a specific mathematical problem, you have to state a complete set of requirements for r(t). Is this a physics problem? Are forces involved?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
There are many possible formulas for r(t) that would produce a curved trajectory. To pose a specific mathematical problem, you have to state a complete set of requirements for r(t). Is this a physics problem? Are forces involved?

I am trying to describe a motion of a clay target in a spring-powered target thrower. You can involve some forces (f.ex. friction between target and friction tunnel of an arm), but this complicates case even more. The only constant I can assume is velocity when target leaves the arm (27m/s). Everything else has to be calculated. The main thing is to have ε of this arm, because then from M=I⋅ε we can have required force in a spring.
 
The instantaneous velocity in polar coordinates is given by the vector [itex]\frac{dr}{dt}r[/itex] in the radial direction and [itex]\frac{d\theta}{dt} \theta[/itex] in the tangential direction. If you want the magnitude of this velocity vector to be 27 m/sec at the time t when the target reaches the end of the arm, you have to keep in mind the contribution of the component [itex]\frac{dr}{dt} r[/itex] to the velocity. It will be important to have a physically reasonable formula for [itex]r(t)[/itex].
 
kamil.borkowski said:
You can involve some forces (f.ex. friction between target and friction tunnel of an arm), but this complicates case even more.
Without forces, how would you know how the object moves?
kamil.borkowski said:
Everything else has to be calculated.
There are many possible motions that end with a speed of 27m/s.
 
kamil.borkowski said:
The only constant I can assume is velocity when target leaves the arm (27m/s). Everything else has to be calculated,
I think you at least need to also know the time it needs to get to that speed (from rest?), to get the (constant?) angular acceleration of the thrower. Then I would use the rotating reference frame of the thrower to compute r(t) using the inertial forces there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
679
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K