1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I A weird answer -- Lagrangian mechanics

  1. Aug 9, 2016 #1
    Just refer to my profile picture to see what the issue is! :biggrin:

    Here's the problem: a ball of mass m is connected to a vertical pole with an inextensible, massless string of length r. The angle between the string and the pole is θ. The pole rotates around the z axis with a constant angular velocity $$\dotφ$$

    We can easily determine the following equations:
    $$x=r*sinθ*cosφ$$ $$y=r*sinθ*sinφ$$ $$z=r(1-cosθ)$$

    Now I determined that the pesky Lagrangian is equal to the following:

    So, where's the issue? Well, solving the Euler-Lagrange equations we find this:
    $$mr^2\ddot\phi sin\theta+2mr^2\dot\phi\dot\theta cos\theta sin\theta=0$$

    Which means that

    That's a really odd result. φ' is supposed to be constant, so φ''=0. But here we can see that φ'' can only be 0 if either φ' or θ' are 0, or if θ=π/4. Weird.

    Am I missing something (I obviously am, it's a rhetorical question)?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 9, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    You have to set
    $$x=r \cos (\omega t) \sin \theta, \quad y=r \sin(\omega t) \sin \theta, \quad z=r (1-\cos \theta),$$
    evaluate ##T=m \dot{\vec{x}}^2/2## and then derive the equation of motion for ##\theta## via the Euler-Lagrange equations.
  4. Aug 9, 2016 #3
    So I don't have to solve the Euler-Lagrange equations for φ and ##\dotφ## all?
  5. Aug 9, 2016 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    I've reformulated my suggestion a bit, but it's of course finally the same. If I understand your problem right, it's forced to have a rotation with constant angular velocity ##\omega=\dot{\phi}## around the ##z## axis. That's a constraint rather than a degree of freedom.
  6. Aug 9, 2016 #5
    Ah ok! Thanks!
  7. Aug 9, 2016 #6
    Oh whoops, in my original post I meant "if θ was π/2", not π/4.
  8. Aug 9, 2016 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    As I said, you must enforce that ##\dot{\phi}=\text{const}##!
  9. Aug 9, 2016 #8
    Yeah, yeah, I did that, and I got a result that makes sense. I was just saying...
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: A weird answer -- Lagrangian mechanics
  1. Lagrangian mechanics (Replies: 8)

  2. Lagrangian Mechanics (Replies: 1)

  3. Lagrangian mechanics (Replies: 9)

  4. Lagrangian Mechanics (Replies: 2)

  5. Lagrangian mechanics? (Replies: 2)