Cuts of a Feynman diagram and the massless limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of sending mass to zero in the context of a j-point one-loop polygonal Feynman diagram, specifically regarding the massless limit and infrared divergence. Participants clarify that while dimensional regularization does not require a cutoff scale, sending all masses to zero leads to divergent amplitudes as energy approaches zero. The conversation highlights that the final results depend on the energy threshold of measuring apparatus rather than the cutoff itself, emphasizing the importance of understanding infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics (QED).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams and scattering processes
  • Familiarity with dimensional regularization techniques
  • Knowledge of infrared divergences in quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Basic principles of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of dimensional regularization in quantum field theory
  • Explore infrared divergences and their implications in QED
  • Learn about the path integral formulation in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the role of energy thresholds in scattering experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, quantum electrodynamics, and theoretical particle physics, will benefit from this discussion.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
Consider a ##j## point all massive leg one loop polygonal Feynman diagram ##P## representing some scattering process cut on a particular mass channel ##s_i##. Invoking the relevant Feynman rules and proceeding with the integration via dimensional regularisation for example gives me an expression for ##\text{Cut}_{s_i}P\left(p_1^2, \dots, p_j^2, \epsilon\right)##.

I am wondering if someone could explain why it is or is not possible to send the mass corresponding to the channel that was cut to zero if I wanted to consider a massless limit?

Many thanks!
 
Looks like you are talking infrared divergence. If you sent all the masses to zero, the amplitude is divergent as energy goes to zero, thus you have to apply a cutoff. The argument for QED is, by considering there is measuring energy threshold for any apparatus, the final result would not depend on any cutoff but the apparatus threshold.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Rainbowend said:
Looks like you are talking infrared divergence. If you sent all the masses to zero, the amplitude is divergent as energy goes to zero, thus you have to apply a cutoff. The argument for QED is, by considering there is measuring energy threshold for any apparatus, the final result would not depend on any cutoff but the apparatus threshold.
Sorry for the late reply and for just coming back to this thread now. I have yet to take a proper course in the path integral formulism in QFT, so what I say may be a bit incorrect. As far as I understand it, dimensional regularisation is a regularisation procedure in which there is no need to introduce a cut off scale?

If we consider a 4 propagator cut of the massive box, then taking four prop cuts reduces its weight to zero and thus its expansion in the regulator starts off as const + A##\epsilon##. I am not sure if this is related to the fact that the 4 prop cut of the all massless box can be obtained by simply sending all masses to zero in the 4 cut of the massive box? At least my prof gave me the impression you could, but I am still understanding why.

This thread is a month old and Rainbowend only has two posts so might be away. If anyone else has anything to say, please do, thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K