Cyclopse Cat lived for one day

  • Thread starter Thread starter scott1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the phenomenon of a cyclops cat that lived for only one day, exploring reactions to its existence, the authenticity of images, and related anatomical observations. The conversation includes emotional responses, skepticism about the veracity of the images, and references to similar cases in human fetal development.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express sadness over the cyclops cat's short life, noting its unusual appearance as both alien-like and cute.
  • Concerns are raised about the authenticity of the images, with participants pointing out that kittens are born with their eyes closed and questioning the size of the eye depicted.
  • One participant mentions previous experiences with human fetal cyclopes, suggesting that larger eyes are a common trait in such cases, which may lend some credibility to the image.
  • Another participant expresses general skepticism about information found online, indicating a default position of doubt.
  • References to other images of cyclops cats are shared, with some participants labeling them as fake.
  • A later post mentions that an Associated Press writer claims to have access to original images that may confirm the authenticity of the cyclops cat's existence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of emotional responses and skepticism regarding the authenticity of the cyclops cat images. There is no consensus on whether the images are genuine or fabricated, and multiple competing views remain regarding their credibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference anatomical details and the conditions under which kittens are born, indicating a reliance on specific biological knowledge. The discussion also touches on the potential for image manipulation, highlighting uncertainties in verifying the authenticity of the presented images.

scott1
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/060109/480/nyet27501091906'
It only lived for one day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Poor little thing. I'm surprised the mother cat didn't make a meal of it, that sometimes happens even with healthy kittens.

I've seen quite a few human fetal cyclopes preserved in formalin in my Path museum. 'Fetal monsterism' - somehow that term never got considered un-PC and replaced by some other euphemism.
 
Poor little thing. It only lived for one day. :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

But it looks really cool! Its like an alien or something, but its still cute. :smile:
 
Mk said:
Its like an alien or something
I almost thought it was an alien.
 
What I find strange about the pic -
The "eye" is significantly larger than normal kitten eyes would be at that postnatal time.
Kittens are born with their eyes closed and do not open them for at least several days and this one supposedly only survived one day.
The singular form of Cyclops is not spelled with an "es".

Based on this, my general impression about the picture and what I know can be easily done in Photoshop, I'm hesitant to believe it.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I followed the same logic. It is associated Press, but I'll hedge my bets.
 
DocToxyn said:
What I find strange about the pic -
The "eye" is significantly larger than normal kitten eyes would be at that postnatal time.
Kittens are born with their eyes closed and do not open them for at least several days and this one supposedly only survived one day.
The singular form of Cyclops is not spelled with an "es".
Based on this, my general impression about the picture and what I know can be easily done in Photoshop, I'm hesitant to believe it.

Interestingly, the human fetal Cyclopes I've seen seemed to have eyes that were significantly larger than a normal fetal/neonatal eye. Also, the eye was exposed, the fused set of eyelids presumably not having enough reach to cover the organ.

I've not seen fetal cyclopes of other mammals, but from my memory of what human fetal monsters look like, I don't see a reason to doubt the authenticity of this image.
 
It's the InterWeb, I doubt by default.
 
Here is another mythical cyclopscat, straight from ogrish.com:

http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/7979/cycloop11fw.jpg
http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/4563/cycloop20sd.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
PIT2 said:
Here is another mythical cyclopscat, straight from ogrish.com:
http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/7979/cycloop11fw.jpg
http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/4563/cycloop20sd.jpg
That looks very fake...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Yeah, that one's fake.
 
  • #12
I saw another article about it soewhere.


They say the the AP writer got ahold of the origianl memory card and that there are several different angles and a correct sequence. I guess he thinks that they are basically unfakeable. Also, I guess the lady is preserving it in a freexer in case any scientists want to look at it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K