Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Cyclotron Resonance (Solid State Physics)

  1. Apr 7, 2007 #1

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Cyclotron resonance for a spheroidal energy surface. Consider the energy surface

    [tex] \epsilon(\mathbf{k}) = \hbar^2 \left( \frac{k_x^2 + k_y^2}{2m_t} + \frac{k_z^2}{2m_l} \right) [/tex]​

    where mt is the transverse mass parameter and ml is the longitudinal mass parameter. A surface on which [itex] \epsilon(\mathbf{k}) [/itex] is constant will be a spheroid. Use the equation of motion with [itex] \mathbf{v} = \hbar^{-1} \nabla_{\mathbf{k}} \epsilon [/itex] to show that [itex] \omega_c = eB/(m_l m_t)^{1/2}c [/itex] when the static magnetic field B lies in the xy plane.

    2. Relevant equations

    Dynamics of Bloch Electrons

    The equation of motion for an electron subject to the periodic potential of a crystal lattice is

    [tex] \hbar \frac{d\mathbf{k}}{dt} = -\frac{e}{c}\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} \ \ \ \textrm{cgs} [/tex]


    [tex] \hbar \frac{d\mathbf{k}}{dt} = -e\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} \ \ \ \textrm{SI} [/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    [tex] \mathbf{v} = \hbar^{-1} \nabla_{\mathbf{k}} \epsilon(\mathbf{k}) = \hbar^{-1} \left( \hat{k}_x \frac{\partial}{\partial k_x} + \hat{k}_y \frac{\partial}{\partial k_y} + \hat{k}_z \frac{\partial}{\partial k_z} \right) \hbar^2 \left( \frac{k_x^2 + k_y^2}{2m_t} + \frac{k_z^2}{2m_l} \right) [/tex]​

    [tex] = \hbar \left( \hat{k}_x \frac{k_x}{m_t} + \hat{k}_y \frac{k_y}{m_t} + \hat{k}_z \frac{k_z}{m_l} \right) [/tex]​

    Apply the equation of motion with

    [tex] \mathbf{B} = B_x \hat{x} + B_y \hat{y} [/tex]

    [tex] \frac{d\mathbf{k}}{dt} = -\frac{e}{c}\left( \hat{k}_x \frac{k_x}{m_t} + \hat{k}_y \frac{k_y}{m_t} + \hat{k}_z \frac{k_z}{m_l} \right) \times (B_x \hat{x} + B_y \hat{y}) [/tex]

    Right so, um how am I supposed to proceed to compute such a cross product? :uhh:
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 7, 2007 #2

    mjsd

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    so, you have problem with mixing coordinate space vectors with momentum space vectors. you can still do this as long as you know what is
    [tex]\hat k_i \times \hat x_j[/tex]
    at the moment I can't recall what this is... but i think [tex]\hat k_i \perp \hat x_i[/tex]
    should try the momentum space representation of the position operator as a guide to convert them, perhaps?
     
  4. Jun 10, 2008 #3
    Did you ever figure this out?
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2008
  5. Jun 10, 2008 #4
    I just had this on a test, but didn't get it done so as you can imagine i was curious about it. Also, just realized you put this on here a year ago so nevermind.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook