lavster
- 213
- 0
Is the d'alembertian of lorentz transformation matrix 0? and why? would it be 0 because it lorentz invariant?
thanks
thanks
D'alembertian of lorentz transformation matrix
- Context: Graduate
- Thread starter lavster
- Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Discussion
Physics news on Phys.org
- 3,742
- 249
The LT is linear in x and t. Any second derivative would =0.
Similar threads
Graduate Show Lagrangian is invariant under a Lorentz transformation without using generators
- binbagsss
- · Replies 3 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 3
Undergrad Lorentz Transformation Matrix: Tensor of Order 2?
- Ben Geoffrey
- · Replies 5 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 5
Undergrad Question about full Lorentz transformation
- Chenkel
- · Replies 101 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 101
Undergrad Index placement -- Lorentz transformation matrix
- dyn
- · Replies 9 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 9
Undergrad Strange index notation for linear transformation matrix
- sphyrch
- · Replies 4 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 4
Undergrad Lorentz Transformation: Premises + Derivation
- Immer Tzaddi
- · Replies 5 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 5
Graduate Lorentz transformation matrix and its inverse
- dyn
- · Replies 19 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 19
Undergrad Lorentz transformation of the "bilinear spinor matrixelement"
- Garlic
- · Replies 7 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 7
Graduate What is the determinant of a Lorentz transformation matrix?
- vin300
- · Replies 3 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 3
Undergrad Lorentz transformation for 3 frames
- arnau
- · Replies 7 ·
- Special and General Relativity
- Replies
- 7